Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Entamoeba histolytica life cycle-en.svg

Support as nominator LadyofHats (talk) 12:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excystation doesn't look quite right to me. Can you check that, and possibly add a little more detail to that part of the process? Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- You may be interested in the extensive discussion at PPR - see here. What exactly doesn't look right about excystation? --jjron (talk) 13:59, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Everything said about excystation in the pic seems correct (I looked it up in [1][2]). Narayanese (talk) 10:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comparing to ref 1, it looks like Excystation looks OK, considering that each nucleus would go into a different compartment. I like the treatment of the amoebae, the coloring and outlines look slick. Should capitalize the T in "through the bloodstream" under invasive infection. Thanks for adding citations as well. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 00:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can't spot any errors, and it is indeed informative. Narayanese (talk) 15:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Would be nice if the "default size" (whats the SVG term for this) was > 1000px. I understand that I could download the image and open it in a compatible editor and make it whatever size I want, but, thats kind of a hassle. Thanks. --Uncle Bungle (talk) 03:44, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted (stale, no quorum) MER-C 09:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]