Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Lillium Stamens.jpg
- Reason
- A useful photographic illustration of many flower parts. The numbers allow it to be readable at thumbnail size.
- Articles this image appears in
- Lilium, Flower
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 00:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good EV. Focus is good where required. --Muhammad(talk) 04:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support, brilliantly encyclopedic and very attractive. J Milburn (talk) 11:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Needs NR on the background --Fir0002 08:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Did it, though it was extremely minor. I had to zoom to a 3-400% to see it clearly. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Were you looking in the right place? It's not visible in the OOF lily, but (its still) quite strong in the shadow area. But I must say it shows up much more strongly on my new (Dell) monitor than my old one... I'll try do an edit later today unless you beat me to it --Fir0002 22:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Did it in the darker shadow sections, you may have to do the control-shift-R thing. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm still a fair bit there - ran it through another NR pass. Though to be honest I wouldn't have picked up on it but for this new Dell which I hadn't had a chance to calibrate properly - the gamma setting was bringing out too much shadow detail (I've done some rough calibration on it now which is better and I'll probably give it a Spyder calibration in a week or two)...--Fir0002 11:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Can't see anything A/Bing them. Noodle snacks (talk) 12:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm still a fair bit there - ran it through another NR pass. Though to be honest I wouldn't have picked up on it but for this new Dell which I hadn't had a chance to calibrate properly - the gamma setting was bringing out too much shadow detail (I've done some rough calibration on it now which is better and I'll probably give it a Spyder calibration in a week or two)...--Fir0002 11:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Did it in the darker shadow sections, you may have to do the control-shift-R thing. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Were you looking in the right place? It's not visible in the OOF lily, but (its still) quite strong in the shadow area. But I must say it shows up much more strongly on my new (Dell) monitor than my old one... I'll try do an edit later today unless you beat me to it --Fir0002 22:46, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Did it, though it was extremely minor. I had to zoom to a 3-400% to see it clearly. Noodle snacks (talk) 09:00, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Outstanding image.--ragesoss (talk) 19:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support - Very good! A shame that a whole petal isn't shown in full focus but we can't have everything -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Great photo and very good encyclopaedic value. I bet this will turn up in homework round the world... |→ Spaully₪† 12:50, 8 April 2009 (GMT)
- Support - Educational and visually appealing. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful image. Synergy 21:36, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Promoted File:Lillium Stamens.jpg MER-C 12:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
