Wikipedia:Featured article review/Dungeons & Dragons (album)/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Mass Message Send notifications, talk page notice 2021-03-28
Review section
[edit]This 2007 Featured article was noticed on 2021-03-28 for sourcing issues, with no follow up to additional query in February 2022. There are also prose issues, which I will detail if someone intends to work on this. Some TLC is needed to bring this to FA standards. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Pinging @J Milburn who was the main editor to work on this. Also @Sariel Xilo in case he's got anything that could be used here. BOZ (talk) 04:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I'm afraid I don't have the time to take the lead on this at present, and I worry that the sourcing issues might be difficult to overcome. But if someone else is able/willing to take the lead, I'm happy to contribute. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, zero edits. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:07, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - sourcing is not at the current standard and I am concerned, to some extent, that it could be fairly difficult to find sourcing that fits the higher bar of high-quality RS rather than just RS for this subject (although I don't know that several of the sources currently used would strictly be considered RS these days). Hog Farm Talk 19:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC No edits to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and prose. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, unfortunately, as the sourcing concerns have not been overcome. Hog Farm Talk 02:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no edits to address sourcing. Z1720 (talk) 18:30, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.