Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/John Sculley/archive1
Peer review 1
1st nomination of this article for FA status. Referenced, well written and a good flow. I believe it meets the criteria, if there are any issues I'll try to address them. — Wackymacs 12:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
- Approve - I Second that notion. well written. only suggestion would be to add a spoken file. --Preschooler.at.heart 02:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment 3 references worries me; any chance of adding more? A good article to be sure, but maybe not yet up to featured status. Batmanand | Talk 10:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Those are general references, look at the footnotes section for specific references tied in with the context (there are 22 footnotes in total). — Wackymacs 16:13, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- Object.
"Background and personal life" does not list a source. The feud with Steve Jobs needs expansion.what about some words from Jobs about Sculley? has anyone else talked about Sculley who has had business dealings with him? any positive or negative quotes?un-redlink "pepsi generation"and describe it in this article. what was sculley's involvement with it exactly?the writing is not very good in the "scully at pepsi" section, jumping around in time and place, v. confusing, please have it copyedited. images lack detailed fairuse rationale.Zzzzz 21:09, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
- A reference has been added to the background and personal life section, and fair use rationales have been added to the images. Other changes have also been made. — Wackymacs 10:09, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral. Seens a little on the short side, and there seem to be many holes in the coverage. More pictures? And maybe a more recent salary? And of couse, all the above.--HereToHelp 20:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral. Would personally prefer a non-biography article after we've already done one. It's not that this article is bad; I just don't think it's the right time to choose it. (^'-')^ Covington 04:34, 14 April 2006 (UTC)