Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/Hill

Hill

Nominated on 15:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC); needs 15 votes by 10 April.

Such a common geographical feature and almost nobody has taken care of it.

Support:

1. Francisco Valverde 15:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
2. Clayrocks369 05:29, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
3. Y Ynhockey ^(Talk) Y 17:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
4. King of Hearts | (talk) 00:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
5. Juppiter 00:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
6. Daniel Collins 03:33, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
7. Crna ^t_e^c Gora 04:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
8. PDXblazers 00:02, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
9. Badlands17 04:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
10. --HolyRomanEmperor 15:03, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
11. Kingpomba 08:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
12. Pointlessness 20:28, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
13. -Reuvenk_[T][C] 00:16, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
14. J. Finkelstein 18:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

• I know that we have FAs on mundae subjects like butter, but could hill really make it as a FA? Is there enough to say? -Reuvenk_[T][C] 06:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• i can't belive this has been overlooked such a base article, it has my vote. Kingpomba 08:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

• Compare Hill with Dune. I believe they are just as notable... Francisco Valverde 18:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree, these articles should be comparable, but how much can you say about this that isn't already stated in erosion or geology or something like that? I still support the nomination, but I think you'll need an expert or at least someone with a good book to write something good. J. Finkelstein 18:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

---