Wikipedia:Collaboration of the week/19th century
Appearance
- Nominated on 14:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC); needs 15 votes by January 6.
Ridiculously small article. Compare to 20th century. Should be easy to write, too.
Support:
- BRIAN0918 14:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- ike9898 16:23, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Pyro19 20:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- As2431 08:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Gflores Talk 21:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- SoothingR(pour) 13:00, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
- – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 03:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Rampart 12:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Astrokey44 13:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- RENTASTRAWBERRY FOR LET? röck 01:06, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- Darwinek 16:14, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- JustinWick 23:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Soul assassin 16:34, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
- I agree it is ridiculously short. An improvment is needed. As2431 08:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, ridiculously tiny. Gflores Talk 21:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- A very important century, lets get this article in shape! - JustinWick 23:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- The 20th century article is badly written. Please stick to the template for century articles - Wikipedia:Timeline standards. --Brunnock 01:46, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
- A very important century, lets get this article in shape! - JustinWick 23:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, ridiculously tiny. Gflores Talk 21:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)