Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/KingpinBot 6
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.
Operator: Kingpin13 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 22:21, Wednesday November 23, 2011 (UTC)
Automatic or Manual:
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Yes, see the code from last year
Function overview: Logging of voters for ArbCom elections.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Every hour during the election period (27 November to 10 December)
Estimated number of pages affected: One, Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2011/Log
Exclusion compliant (Y/N): No
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function details: Pretty straightforward, see Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/RSElectionBot
Discussion
[edit]Just looking to get re-approval for the task, for me to run it, DQ won't be running it this year as he is running. Should be simple. - Kingpin13 (talk) 22:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have done a test edit using last year's poll, at User:KingpinBot/ACELoggingTest - Kingpin13 (talk) 22:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to confirm, this is the same code as last year just with a different bot op? Anomie⚔ 23:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's correct, the only code changes will be minor ones to change where the bot saves the log (Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2011/Log instead of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Log), and which poll it looks at. - Kingpin13 (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedily Approved. Already-approved code, trusted bot op. Anomie⚔ 01:19, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's correct, the only code changes will be minor ones to change where the bot saves the log (Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2011/Log instead of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Log), and which poll it looks at. - Kingpin13 (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.