Jump to content

Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BunnysBot 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Operator: Bunnypranav (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 12:58, Tuesday, November 26, 2024 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: WikiProject Tagging for Belgian cinema task force

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests#Tagging Category:Cinema of Belgium

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 2871

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: WikiProject tagging for these 1682 and 1189 pages per Wikipedia:Bot requests#Tagging Category:Cinema of Belgium.

Discussion

[edit]

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Please do 25 for each "type" you have listed above. Primefac (talk) 20:35, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac Trial complete. Contribs
25 Edits done adding parameters for WikiProject Film and WikiProject Biography, 16 edits done to adding WikiProject Belgium to pages where it does not exist at all. The reduction in number of second type is due to me using the same list of pages for a second run. I hope that is not a problem.
Unfortunately, due to over complications in regex, both tasks cannot be done in a single go. Though the overlap of pages (i.e. 2 edits done for a single page) is not for many pages. Based on this xtool analysis, only 10 pages were edited twice, for the 33 pages sampled (33-25=8 were skipped entirely due to no changes being required). ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update: The second type will not be done per below discussion. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Due to a misconfiguration in the setting, the second page's edit has to be reverted and redone. This did not occur again, so no worries here.
Pinging @Earthh to double check the edits and see if anything is wrong. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:57, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for pinging me. I've reviewed the edits and made some adjustments:
I removed WikiProject Belgium from six entries (Aurore Clément, Monica Bellucci, Costa-Gavras, Emir Kusturica, Vincent Lindon, and Pierre Richard). These were included in the query because they are part of Category:Magritte Award winners; this category generally includes only Belgian personalities, except for recipients of the Honorary Magritte Award, which is awarded regardless of nationality. The only other entries unrelated to the WikiProjects we’re tagging are Agnès Jaoui, Sandrine Bonnaire, André Dussollier, and Nathalie Baye, who are also winners of the award but not Belgian.
Apart from this, everything looks good. Earthh (talk) 13:02, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So how can I prevent this in the main automated run? Noting that out of 16 additions of WP Belgium, 6 were not needed. Should I just stop that type of run, and only continue with changing of params for existing banners? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from the six entries I removed, there are four additional entries that are unrelated to WP Belgium and haven't been tagged yet. Could we manually exclude these entries when tagging? I wouldn't recommend excluding Category:Magritte Award winners entirely, as it would mean missing a significant portion of individuals from the Belgian film industry. Otherwise, we could continue with changing of parameters for existing banners, as you suggested. Earthh (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would prefer just changing params. Such a large number of unrelated tagging is not recommended for a automated bot task. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Earthh (talk) 13:59, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This sounds like an extended trial is needed. Are you set for running one or is there more discussion needed to determine the best parameters? Primefac (talk) 16:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think an extended trial is needed. I have done 25 edits doing one set of replacements, and 16 doing another set. After the above discussion, I will not do the second set for the full lists. No params are changed for the first set.Pinging @Earthh for their opinion.
Though I leave the final decision to you, I am ready to run one if required. Thanks! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 16:50, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No further discussion is needed from my side. I'd say proceed as Bunnypranav suggested. Earthh (talk) 18:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for extended trial (25 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Primefac (talk) 21:45, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. Contribs, no errors found from my end.
@Earthh sorry if the pings are too much, can you look into the edits? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:08, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A few edits can be found here, and here as well ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]