Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/BattyBot 22
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Speedily Approved.
Operator: GoingBatty (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 03:24, Saturday April 20, 2013 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): AWB
Source code available: AWB
Function overview: Remove invalid citation parameters
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Category:Pages with citations using unsupported parameters
Edit period(s): As needed
Estimated number of pages affected: hundreds
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes
Function details: Recent changes to the citation templates now display deprecated parameters as errors for all to see. This request is to be able to programatically remove those parameters as needed, such as 300+ instances of |curly=y
from {{cite news}}. (Suggestions welcome for additional parameters to be removed.)
Note that this is not a request to remove every incorrect parameter, as many are misspellings (e.g. |accessdte=
) or may contain valuable information that should be moved to a supported parameter (e.g. |unused_data=
).
AWB general fixes will also be done at the same time, which includes additional functionality to rename template parameters. GoingBatty (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion
[edit]Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 17:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Trial complete. - diffs are available here. GoingBatty (talk) 18:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedily Approved. edits look good, good task, good bot op. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 14:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.