Wikipedia:April Fools/April Fools' Day 2011/Mark Wahlberg RFA
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
'Final (7/3/1); ended 01:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC) - Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII Undertaker 19–0 01:15, 2 April 2011 (UTC)' ; Scheduled to end 23:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
[edit]Mark Wahlberg (contribs)– I'd like to nominate Mark for adminship.
Mark has been on Wikipedia since 2003[1] and is active on other projects [2][3]. Wahlberg has contributed in the areas of sexual content, middle-eastern affairs, and numerous BLPs. I feel that he is ready to be an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Keegan (talk) 03:57, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
General comments
[edit]- Links for Mark Wahlberg: Mark Wahlberg (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Mark Wahlberg can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
Discussion
[edit]RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
Support
[edit]- He was so cute back when he was one of those new kids... Risker (talk) 04:05, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Great work. I thought you were already an admin. Orphan Wiki 09:58, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I for one welcome our new computer overlords! --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 13:07, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sex. Will fit in well with our current admin corp. —Dark 13:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. He's too badass to not be an admin. --Ixfd64 (talk) 17:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support on the condition that you say "hi" to your mother for me. Eagles 24/7 (C) 19:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Come on, come on! FEEL IT! FEEL IT! Feel the vibration.--Sloane (talk) 21:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
[edit]- Oppose. NaN% automated edits is too high. 28bytes (talk) 04:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How the hell are you not scared of him? NW (Talk) 04:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose only because Mark L. Walberg would make a better admin. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
[edit]- Neutral - Would've been good if not for Marky Mark. --TitanOne (talk) 17:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.