Wikipedia:Five pillars of evil
 | This is a humorous essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors and is made to be humorous. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. This essay isn't meant to be taken seriously. |
 | This is a decree by the Supreme Cabal Regime of the English Wikipedia (SCREW). It expresses opinions and ideas that are absolutely and irrefutably true whether you like them or not. Changes to it must reflect the wishes of the Supreme Cabal. When in doubt, please ignore the talk page and just keep reverting. |
The proper behavior of a Rouge administrator can be described by five pillars of evil that define their character:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
incorporating only material deemed to be "encyclopedic". This term need not have a consistent definition, but is always in alignment with whatever an administrator thinks.
Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
and since administrators are community-appointed stewards, whose point of view could possibly be more neutral?
Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
Wikipedians should interact in a respectful and civil manner
with administrators even when you don't agree with them. Be civil (note: ordinary users only). Avoid edit wars with admins, as they are always right; remember that there are 6,912,522 other articles on the English Wikipedia to work on and discuss, so why don't you go somewhere else (and counting) if you've got a problem? Act in good faith (Note: administrators can still assume bad faith on your part), and assume good faith on the part of administrators.
Wikipedia has no firm rules
Note
[edit]This page describes Rouge administrators' fundamental principles. These principles pre-date the creation of this page.