Jump to content

Walter Block

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Walter E. Block)

Walter Block
Walter Block speaking in May 2016
Born
Walter Edward Block

(1941-08-21) August 21, 1941 (age 83)
New York City, U.S.
EducationBrooklyn College (BA)
Columbia University (PhD)
Academic career
FieldPolitical economy, environmental economics, transport economics, political philosophy
School or
tradition		Austrian School
Doctoral
advisor		Gary Becker, William Landes
InfluencesLudwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, Ayn Rand, Milton Friedman, Friedrich Hayek, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Ron Paul, Lew Rockwell, H.L. Mencken
ContributionsEvictionism
Signature
This article is part of a series on
Libertarianism
in the United States
Schools
Principles
History
Economics
Intellectuals
Commentators
Politicians
Issues
Culture
Organizations
Literature
See also

Walter Edward Block (born August 21, 1941) is an American Austrian School economist and anarcho-capitalist theorist.[1] He was the Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair in Economics at the School of Business at Loyola University New Orleans and a former senior fellow of the non-profit think-tank Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama.[2]

Personal life

[edit]

Walter Block was born in Brooklyn, New York to Jewish parents Abraham Block, a certified public accountant, and Ruth Block, a paralegal, both of whom Block has said were liberals.[3] He attended James Madison High School, where Bernie Sanders was on his track team.[4] Block earned his PhD degree in economics from Columbia University and wrote his dissertation on rent control in the United States under Gary Becker.[5] Block identifies himself as a "devout atheist".[6]

In an interview, Block stated, "In the fifties and sixties, I was just another commie living in Brooklyn."[7] Block credits his shift to libertarianism to his having attended a lecture by Ayn Rand while he was an undergraduate student.[3] Block later attended a luncheon with Rand, Nathaniel Branden, and Leonard Peikoff at which Branden suggested that Block read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand and Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt.[3] He says that the final push to his conversion came from having met Austrian School and anarcho-capitalist theorist Murray Rothbard.[3] While Block is an anarcho-capitalist and, unlike the Objectivist followers of Ayn Rand, ultimately opposed to limited or minimal government, and even while criticizing her movement as "cultish", Block still describes himself as "a big fan" of Rand and considers Atlas Shrugged to be "the best novel ever written."[8][better source needed]

Professional career

[edit]
Walter Block

Walter Block received a B.A. in philosophy from Brooklyn College in 1964 and a PhD in economics from Columbia University in 1972. He taught at the University of Central Arkansas, Holy Cross College, Baruch College and Rutgers University. He now holds the Harold E. Wirth Eminent Scholar Endowed Chair in Economics at the Butt College of Business, Loyola University, in New Orleans.[9]

From 1979 to 1991, Block was the senior economist with the Fraser Institute.[5] He was also a senior fellow at the think-tank Ludwig von Mises Institute from 2000–2024, where he has published various blog posts, papers, and books.[9][10]

In the years since 1971, his work has been published in the Journal of Libertarian Studies, the Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, the Review of Austrian Economics, the American Journal of Economics and Sociology, the Journal of Labor Economics and Public Choice[11][12] and in Psychology Today and other popular media.[13] In 2017, he hit the milestone of publishing over 500 peer-reviewed articles.[14]

Defending the Undefendable

[edit]
Further information: Defending the Undefendable

Walter Block has written two dozen books.[15] He is best known for his 1976 book Defending the Undefendable.[16][17] The book has been translated into ten foreign languages.[9] Fox Business Channel pundit John Stossel wrote that Block's "eye-opening" book inspired him to see that economics "illuminates what common sense overlooks."[18]

Viewpoints

[edit]

Slavery and segregation

[edit]

"Voluntary slave contract"

[edit]
Part of a series on
Anarcho-capitalism
Origins
Concepts
People
Works
Issues
Related topics

Block believes that people should have the legal right to sell themselves into slavery, or to buy and keep slaves who have sold themselves into slavery, in a libertarian legal order.[citation needed]

In an essay on "inalienability" of natural and legal rights, Block defends what he calls a "voluntary slave contract", arguing that it is "a bona fide contract where consideration crosses hands; when it is abrogated, theft occurs". He notes that Robert Nozick agrees with him, and critiques the views of the libertarians who disagree. Block seeks to make "a tiny adjustment" which "strengthens libertarianism by making it more internally consistent." He argues that his position shows "that contract, predicated on private property [can] reach to the furthest realms of human interaction, even to voluntary slave contracts."[19]

Slavery and civil rights in the United States

[edit]

A January 2014 article in the New York Times said Block "suggested in an interview that the daily life of the enslaved was 'not so bad – you pick cotton and sing songs.'"[20] The piece also reported that Block said Woolworth's had the right to exclude black people from its lunch counters, asserting that "no one is compelled to associate with people against their will." Block responded to the article by accusing the Times of libel for taking quotes out of context and claiming the latter quote was not accurate.[21] In his response he called slavery "depraved and monstrous," arguing that it is not the nature of the work slaves perform that makes slavery monstrous, but rather it is the fact that they are forced to perform it and are not free to leave. According to Block's argument, forcing a slave to perform pleasant tasks would be no less monstrous because it equally violates the libertarian non-aggression principle. An Inside Higher Education piece noted that, in response to the story, seventeen faculty members at Block's university publicly called for him to be censured for his "recurring public attacks ... on the civil rights of all." The piece also reported that Reverend Kevin Wildes, the President of Block's university, took the "unusual step" of publicly critiquing his arguments as fallacious.[22]

Pay gap for black people and women

[edit]

In a 2008 lecture Block called "Injustices in the Politics and Economics of Social Justice" presented at the invitation of the Adam Smith Society of the Economics Department of Loyola College, Baltimore Block said "blacks and women" were paid less than whites because they are "less productive".[23]

In the lecture, Block defended his views on women saying among younger and unmarried women, there is virtually no income disparity. When asked by an attendee to explain the difference in productivity between blacks and whites, he said that as an economist he was not qualified to explain the disparity. Block offered two thoughts that might account for the disparity: first, what he called the "politically correct" explanation, or socioeconomic disparities and historical injustices towards blacks; for the second thought, which he calls the "political incorrect", he refers to R. Herrnstein and C. Murray's book "The Bell Curve".[23]

James Gill wrote in the Times-Picayune that the lecture "ignited a furor", resulting in the president of the university, Reverend Brian F. Linnane, apologizing for what was taken as a "sexist and racist outburst", with Gill opining that, "ideas contrary to fashionable preconceptions are always likely to throw academia into a fit".[24]

According to Inside Higher Ed:

Perhaps almost as notable as the president's direct response was the condemnation issued jointly by the college's economics department and the Adam Smith Society ... "It is important to note that the remark was offensive not just because it was racially insensitive, but because it was erroneous and indicated poor-quality scholarship. There is ample scholarly evidence that, after adjusting for productivity-related characteristics (e.g., years of schooling, work experience, union and industry status, etc.) a considerable wage gap remains."[23]

Despite the criticism showing evidence questioning the veracity of his statements, Block said he "regards sensitivity as the enemy of intellectual inquiry and truth."[24][25] In a December 2008 article, Block wrote that the lessons he had learned from the incident were regarding the need for tenure if one wants to speak out, the wisdom of Murray Rothbard's words that "it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects" while remaining ignorant of economics, and the importance of Ludwig von Mises' motto: "Do not give in to evil, but proceed ever more boldly against it."[26]

Sexual assault

[edit]

Block asserts that sexual harassment "that takes place between secretary and her boss is not a coercive action like the pinching that takes place in the public sphere." He claims this is the case since the secretary "agrees to all aspects of the job when she agrees to accept the job and especially when she agrees to keep the job". He calls this a "package-deal". He further differentiates this from acts taking place in public areas as they are not privately owned and therefore there can be no agreement to what he calls the "package-deal", and since the pincher isn't the private owner. He argues that "if pinching and sexual molestation are outlawed in private places, this violates the rights of those who voluntarily wish to engage in such practice." Block argues that the proof of the "voluntary" nature of such an act in a private place is that "the person endangered" (the victim woman) "has no claim [right] whatsoever to the private place in question [...] If she continues to patronize or work at a place where she is molested, it can only be voluntary"[27]

Highway privatization

[edit]
Further information: Highway privatization and Free-market roads

Block says government management of roads and highways is not only inefficient, but also deadly. He argues that "road socialism" causes the deaths of more than 35,000 people in the United States each year. And, although many people blame highway deaths on alcohol, unsafe vehicles, or speeding, Block lays the blame on the government officials who manage the highway system. "It may well be that speed and alcohol are deleterious to safe driving; but it is the road manager's task to ascertain that the proper standards are maintained with regard to these aspects of safety. If unsafe conditions prevail in a private, multistory parking lot, or in a shopping mall, or in the aisles of a department store, the entrepreneur in question is held accountable."[28]

Punishment of government employees

[edit]

Block has written about punishment of those engaging in "statist, governmental or other gangster activity". He argues there should be "a presumption that all government employees are guilty of a crime against humanity," though he notes that this presumption can be rebutted in many cases, such as that of U.S. Congressman and Mises Institute Senior Fellow Ron Paul. Block examines issues like restitution of land taken through eminent domain and possible retribution against politicians, IRS employees, and others who cooperated in governmental activity. He describes rules by which libertarian "Nuremberg Trials" might operate.[29][30]

Evictionism (in contrast to abortion)

[edit]
Further information: Evictionism, Libertarian perspectives on abortion, and Stem cell controversy

According to Block's moral theory, the act of abortion must be conceptually separated into the acts of the eviction of the fetus from the womb, and the killing of the fetus. Building on the libertarian stand against trespass and murder, Block supports a right to the first act, but, except in certain circumstances, not the second act. Block believes the woman may legally abort if the fetus is not viable outside the womb, or the woman has announced to the world her abandonment of the right to custody of the fetus, and no one else has "homesteaded" that right by offering to care for the fetus.[31]

He also has written on finding a compromise between those who believe stem cell research is murder and those who favor it. He applies a libertarian theory of private property rights to his premise that even fertilized eggs have human rights and that the relevant issues are competition between researchers and those who wish to adopt the eggs.[32]

Homesteading

[edit]

Blockean Proviso

[edit]

Block argues that if property is "necessary" for others to use, to get to unowned property, they have a easement over it and compared it to a person who murders a child without feeding it.[33] He cites the example of a person with donut shaped land who doesn't allow anyone to get to the middle of his land as incompatible with the logic of homesteading.[34]

Picture a bagel (or donut) with a hole in it. Label the hole in the center as 'A,' the bagel itself as 'B' and the surrounding territory, lying outside of the bagel, as 'C.' Suppose that someone, call him Mr. B, homesteads the land depicted by B. Assume away any possibility of tunneling under, or bridging or flying a helicopter over this terrain, B. Mr. B, then, controls area A, without ever having lifted a finger in the direction of homesteading this land, A. Yes, as of now, Mr. B does not own A. But, under our assumptions, he can homestead this territory whenever he wants to do so. Mr. B and [sic] gained an untoward advantage, vis-à-vis all other potential homesteaders of A, who are now residing in territory C, and cannot reach A, without trespassing on B, Mr. B's property. This, I claim, is incompatible with the logic of homesteading.

Stephan Kinsella, who disagreed with Block, coined the term "The Blockean Proviso" after The Lockean Proviso. It has since been called the Blockean or Blockian proviso.[35]

Negative homesteading

[edit]

Block has theorized on whether a person acting in self-defense can harm a human shield or hostage used by an aggressor. Block holds this is legitimate because the human shield is the first victim of the aggressor and, as such, cannot be allowed to pass on their misery to the defending person, the intended second victim of the aggressor. Block calls this "negative homesteading theory".[36][37]

Foreign policy

[edit]

Block supports a non-interventionist foreign policy.[38] On LewRockwell.com, he criticized Randy Barnett's Wall Street Journal editorial on presidential candidate Ron Paul and on foreign policy.[39]

Animal rights

[edit]

Block believes that the libertarian non-aggression principle does not apply to animals and that the right of human owners to kill, torture, or otherwise abuse animals may be an unavoidable corollary of libertarian premises. He articulated this position in a 2017 debate on animal rights, maintaining that groups must be able to petition for rights and respect the rights of others in order to qualify for rights themselves.[40][better source needed]

Publications

[edit]

As author

[edit]
  • Defending the Undefendable (1976; translated into ten foreign languages.[9]) ISBN 0930073053
  • A Response to the Framework Document for Amending the Combines Investigation Act (1982)
  • Focus on Economics and the Canadian Bishops (1983)
  • Focus on Employment Equity: A Critique of the Abella Royal Commission on Equality in Employment (with Michael A. Walker; 1985)
  • The U.S. Bishops and Their Critics: An Economic and Ethical Perspective (1986). ISBN 978-0889750852. OCLC 15348791
  • Lexicon of Economic Thought (with Michael A. Walker; 1988) ISBN 978-0889750814. OCLC 246846272
  • Economic Freedom of the World, 1975–1995 (with James Gwartney, Robert Lawson; 1996)
  • Labor Economics from a Free Market Perspective: Employing the Unemployable (2008). ISBN 978-9812705686. OCLC 169873717
  • The Privatization of Roads and Highways: Human and Economic Factors (2009). ISBN 978-0773458413. OCLC 64487353
  • Differing Worldviews in Higher Education: Two Scholars Argue Cooperatively about Justice Education (2010) ISBN 978-9460913501
  • Building Blocks for Liberty (2010). Ludwig von Mises Institute, ISBN 978-1933550916. OCLC 717747069
  • The case for discrimination. Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute. 2010. ISBN 978-1-933550-81-7.
  • Yes to Ron Paul and Liberty (2012). ISBN 978-4871873239. OCLC 810904922
  • Defending the Undefendable II (2013). ISBN 978-1908089373.
  • Water Capitalism: The Case for Privatizing Oceans, Rivers, Lakes, and Aquifers (2016). ISBN 978-1498518826.
  • Space Capitalism: How Humans Will Colonize Planets, Moons, and Asteroids (2018). ISBN 978-3319746500.
  • The Liberal Case for Israel (2021) (with Alan G. Futerman). ISBN 9789811639531.

As editor

[edit]
  • Zoning: Its Costs and Relevance for the 1980s (Ed.; 1980)
  • Rent Control: Myths & Realities (Ed. with Edgar Olsen; 1981)
  • Discrimination, Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity (Ed. with Michael A. Walker; 1982)
  • Taxation: An International Perspective (Ed. with Michael A. Walker; 1984)
  • Economics and the Environment: A Reconciliation (Ed.; 1985; translated into Portuguese 1992) ISBN 088975067X
  • Morality of the Market: Religious and Economic Perspectives (Ed. with Geoffrey Brennan, Kenneth Elzinga; 1985)
  • Theology, Third World Development and Economic Justice (Ed. with Donald Shaw; 1985)
  • Reaction: The New Combines Investigation Act (Ed.; 1986)
  • Religion, Economics & Social Thought (Ed. with Irving Hexham; 1986)
  • Man, Economy and Liberty: Essays in Honor of Murray N. Rothbard (Ed. with Lew Rockwell; 1988)
  • Breaking the Shackles; the Economics of Deregulation: A Comparison of U.S. and Canadian Experience (Ed. with George Lermer; 1991)
  • Economic Freedom: Toward a Theory of Measurement (Ed.; 1991)
  • Libertarian Autobiographies (Ed.; forthcoming)

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ "About Walter Block". Archived from the original on December 29, 2016. Retrieved March 27, 2014.
  2. ^ "Mises Institute Faculty Listing". Archived from the original on July 28, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2013.
  3. ^ a b c d Block, Walter (December 4, 2002). "On Autobiography". LewRockwell.com. Archived from the original on June 18, 2015.
  4. ^ Chana, Jas (August 20, 2015). "Straight Outta Brooklyn, by Way of Vermont: The Bernie Sanders Story". The Tablet. Archived from the original on February 12, 2016. Retrieved February 12, 2016. At James Madison, Bernie Sanders was a talented athlete and a natural leader. Block recalled how the high school's freshmen would look up to him during their senior year track sessions.
  5. ^ a b "Walter Block" (PDF). WalterBlock.com (Curriculum vitae). p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2019.
  6. ^ Block, Walter (December 28, 2007). "Open Letter to Ron Paul by Walter Block". LewRockwell.com.
  7. ^ "Radical Economics: An Interview with Walter Block". Austrian Economics Newsletter. Summer 1999. Archived from the original on September 14, 2014.
  8. ^ VoluntaryVirtues0com (July 5, 2013). Walter Block on Triple V Roads, Ron Paul, Property Rights, Abortion, Venus Project, FSP, more. YouTube. Retrieved April 7, 2014.[permanent dead link]
  9. ^ a b c d "Walter Block faculty page". Loyola University New Orleans. Archived from the original on November 23, 2013. Retrieved July 31, 2013.
  10. ^ "Walter Block". Ludwig von Mises Institute website. Archived from the original on October 8, 2014.
  11. ^ "Walter Block" (PDF) (Curriculum vitae). sections on Articles Published in Refereed Journals and Reference Works. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2019.
  12. ^ Public Choice Archived January 7, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, publication of Springer Science+Business Media.
  13. ^ Block, Walter. "Psychology Today Blog Index". Retrieved August 4, 2013.
  14. ^ TomWoodsTV (January 12, 2017). Major Milestone: Libertarian Walter Block Looks Back on 500 Peer-Reviewed Articles. Archived from the original on September 26, 2022. Retrieved September 26, 2022 – via YouTube.
  15. ^ "Walter Block" (PDF). WalterBlock.com (Curriculum vitae). p. 1. Archived from the original (PDF) on August 19, 2019.
  16. ^ Murphy, Robert P. (2006). "A Note on Walter Block's Defending the Undefendable". American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 65 (2): 463–467. doi:10.1111/j.1536-7150.2006.00459.x. ISSN 1536-7150. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved April 14, 2021. Walter Block's amusing and popular Defending the Undefendable offers an intentionally shocking collection of short chapters, each praising a different "rogue" of modern society
  17. ^ Carden, Art (August 22, 2020). "Happy Birthday to Libertarian Firebrand Walter Block". independent.org. Oakland, California: Independent Institute. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved April 14, 2021. As befits someone who is probably best known for a book titled Defending the Undefendable, Block is no stranger to controversy.
  18. ^ Stossel, John (August 25, 2011). "Almost Everything We're Taught Is Wrong, Using economics to explode fallacies". Reason. Archived from the original on July 2, 2017.
  19. ^ Block, Walter (Spring 2003). "Towards a Libertarian Theory of Inalienability: A Critique of Rothbard, Barnett, Smith, Kinsella, Gordon, and Epstein" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 17 (2): 44, 46, 82. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 2, 2014.
  20. ^ Tanenhaus, Sam; Ruttenberg, Jim (January 25, 2014). "Rand Paul's Mixed Inheritance". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 16, 2020.
  21. ^ Block, Walter (January 30, 2014). "Reply to the Scurrilous, Libelous, Venomous, Scandalous New York Times Smear Campaign". LewRockwell.com. Archived from the original on July 3, 2020.
  22. ^ Jaschik, Scott (February 24, 2014). "Professor Who Defends Segregation". Inside Higher Education. Archived from the original on April 7, 2020.
  23. ^ a b c Guess, Andy (November 19, 2008). "When Austrian Economics and Jesuit Theology Don't Mix". Inside Higher Education. Archived from the original on December 20, 2008.
  24. ^ a b Gill, James (November 26, 2008). "Loyola economics chair Walter Block ignites furor for asserting that women, blacks less productive in workplace". Times-Picayune. Archived from the original on September 23, 2013.
  25. ^ Block, Walter (November 18, 2008). "A (Not So) Funny Thing Happened to me in Baltimore". LewRockwell.com. Archived from the original on June 18, 2015.
  26. ^ Block, Walter (December 16, 2008). "Battling Political Correctness". LewRockwell.com. Archived from the original on March 26, 2022.
  27. ^ Block, Walter (September 1975). "On The Women's Liberation, or the Male Chauvinist Pig as Hero". The Libertarian Forum. 8 (9): 5–8, at p. 6. Republished in Rothbard, Murray Newton, ed. (2006). The Complete Libertarian Forum (1969–1984) Volume 1: 1969–1975 (PDF). Auburn, Alabama: Ludwig von Mises Institute. pp. 601–604, at p. 602. ISBN 978-1-933550-02-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 11, 2019.
  28. ^ Block, Walter (2009). The Privatization of Roads and Highways: Human and Economic Factors (PDF) (Report). Auburn, AL: The Mises Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 16, 2014.
  29. ^ Block, Walter (2011). "Toward a Libertarian Theory of Guilt and Punishment for the Crime of Statism" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 22: 665–665. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 11, 2013.
  30. ^ Block, Walter (2009). "Libertarian Punishment Theory: Working for, and Donating to, the State". Libertarian Papers. 1 (17): 1–31. Archived from the original on September 14, 2014.
  31. ^ Block, Walter; Whitehead, Roy (2005). "Compromising the uncompromisable: A private property rights approach to resolving the abortion controversy" (PDF). Appalachian Journal of Law. 4 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2022.
    Wisniewski, Jakub Bozydar (2010). "A Critique of Block on Abortion and Child Abandonment" (PDF). Libertarian Papers. 2 16. Ludwig Von Mises Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 16, 2022.
  32. ^ Block, Walter (2010). "A Libertarian Perspective on the Stem Cell Debate: Compromising the Uncompromisible". Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 35: 429–448. PMID 20624766.
    Block, Walter (2010). "Objections to the Libertarian Stem Cell Compromise" (PDF). Libertarian Papers. 2 34. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 5, 2012.
  33. ^ Kinsella, Stephan (September 11, 2007). "The Blockean Proviso". Mises Wire. Archived from the original on March 14, 2021. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
  34. ^ Dominiak, Lukasz (2017). "The Blockian Proviso and Rationality of Property Rights" (PDF). Libertarian Papers.
  35. ^ Block, Walter E.; Butt, Joseph A. (2016). "Forestalling, Positive Obligations and the Lockean and Blockean Provisos: Rejoinder to Stephan Kinsella*" (PDF). Ekonomia. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 7, 2021. Retrieved August 7, 2021.
  36. ^ Jakobsson, Carl (2010). "The Negative Homesteading Theory: Rejoinder to Walter Block on Human Body Shields" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 22 (1). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2013.
  37. ^ Block, Walter (2011). "The Human Body Shield" (PDF). Journal of Libertarian Studies. 22: 625–630. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 10, 2013.
  38. ^ "Toward a Libertarian Society". June 6, 2014. Archived from the original on October 21, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2017.
  39. ^ "Libertarianism vs. War". LewRockwell. Archived from the original on April 7, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2017.
  40. ^ Lucy Steigerwald (August 21, 2017). Animal Rights?: A Debate Between Walter Block and Thomas Raskin. Archived from the original on December 21, 2021. Retrieved January 14, 2018.
[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Walter Block.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_Block&oldid=1249114493"