Jump to content

User talk:WindTempos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:ZudoMC)

Showing impact data for WindTempos

Please enable JavaScript to view this component.

Administrators' newsletter – September 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).

Administrator changes

removed Pppery

Interface administrator changes

removed Pppery

Oversighter changes

removed Wugapodes

CheckUser changes

removed

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past.
  • A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Administrators' newsletter – October 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2024).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates

[edit]

Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates

The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.

Here is the schedule:

  • October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

  • The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
  • Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
  • The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
  • The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
  • Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Discussion phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase

The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 22–24 - Discussion phase
  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.

On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator Elections: Voting phase

[edit]
Administrator Elections | Voting phase

The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

  • October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
  • November 1–? - Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Question from Willuconquerto (16:53, 7 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello Mr. Tempos. Can I have some tips on how I should edit please? Many thanks, Willuconquerto (your disciple) --Willuconquerto (talk) 16:54, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Willuconquerto! That's a pretty broad question - I'd suggest having a look at the links that Gerda Arendt left on your talk page, which will take you to a guide that explains the basics of editing. My best advice is to go out there and make small changes to articles you're interested in, discuss with & listen to feedback from other editors. If you're looking for something to do, the Task Center might inspire you. Let me know if you have any other questions! :) WindTempos (talkcontribs) 17:28, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Mjdonatelli (00:21, 8 November 2024)

[edit]

How do I create an article? --Mjdonatelli (talk) 00:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mjdonatelli! I'd suggest giving Your first article a read. Creating an article is hard - you'll need to be able to demonstrate that the subject of the article is notable, while writing about it in a neutral way.
If you've read the above and are confident enough to go ahead, your best bet is to go through the Article wizard which will guide you through the processs. I'd strongly suggest trying some of the less daunting suggestions at the Task Center to get yourself used to editing first. WindTempos (talkcontribs) 09:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Bulron on Azem Maksutaj (17:42, 13 November 2024)

[edit]

Hello how can I post my songs --Bulron (talk) 17:42, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bulron! Wikipedia has pretty firm criteria when it comes to how we determine whether or not a musician, song, or other music-related topic is suitable for inclusion on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is also not the right place to promote your own music, and it's heavily discouraged to write about yourself (because it's hard to be neutral and objective!)
I hope this helps somewhat, and sorry if this isn't what you wanted to hear! WindTempos (talkcontribs) 14:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Olivia Hartung (02:11, 15 November 2024)

[edit]

I corrected a couple of sentences - small edit - that weren't accurate, with citation. When will the correction appear? --Olivia Hartung (talk) 02:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Olivia Hartung, thanks for your edits! It looks like someone may have changed Endangered Species (1982 film) further since then, because it looks like some of the formatting got a bit broken in the process.
If you're not already doing so, I'd suggest checking your edits before you publish them (because in most cases, they will be visible to everyone straight away!) by clicking the "Show preview" button. You also have a sandbox that you can use to practice editing. Finally, the links at Help:Introduction may help you with adding citations.
Hope these help! WindTempos (talkcontribs) 13:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Olivia Hartung, please see WP:CITE on how to do footnotes. More importantly, IMDB is NOT an acceptable source. Drmies (talk) 14:13, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. My correction appeared, but later disappeared and went back to the inaccurate production notes. Though IMDB is not an acceptable citation source, in the box on the right of the page, Woods and Klinger are correctly listed with the other two screenwriters, Rudolph and Binder. In the production section they are referred to as journalist/researchers. Olivia Hartung (talk) 04:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning people

[edit]

You recently forgot to warn @24.222.65.99 when you reverted their edit. I don't think it was intentional but please don't forget next time. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 16:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. Honestly, this one shouldn't have been a standard rollback, since it could have been reasonably construed to have been in good faith, even if it should have been reverted one way or another. WindTempos they (talkcontribs) 16:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. AGF is important after all and most Recent Changes Patrollers neglect that. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 06:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]