User talk:Znewell/sandbox

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the beginning of the article was relevant but then towards the end it distracts and becomes hard to focus on the topic. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? This article is neutral because it talks about American values and the rights we have even with current events Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The points of human rights currently being violated and current events were underrepresented. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? They are referenced by a lot of sources that present different sides of the information . Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Information on how human rights are being violated now and how human right are enforced. Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? On the talk page they talk about They are speaking on the article in a positive manner bout the facts and the human rights that they touch on. Other discussions about this article are the details and all that is human rights. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any Wiki Projects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Znewell (talk) 18:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything in the beginning of the article was relevant but then towards the end it distracts and becomes hard to focus on the topic. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? This article is neutral because it talks about American values and the rights we have even with current events Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The points of human rights currently being violated and current events were underrepresented. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? They are referenced by a lot of sources that present different sides of the information . Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Information on how human rights are being violated now and how human right are enforced. Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? On the talk page they talk about They are speaking on the article in a positive manner bout the facts and the human rights that they touch on. Other discussions about this article are the details and all that is human rights. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any Wiki Projects? How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? Znewell (talk) 18:45, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia contribution outline

Zuri Newell Human rights Dr. Manley Wikipedia Contribution Outline Article: United Nations Human Trafficking Trust Funds for Victims Article’s information listed: November 4,2010 The United Nations Sectary- general launched the trust fund to provide humanitarian, legal and financial aid to victims of human trafficking, attempting to increase those rescued and give more assistance. This is established in accordance to Article 38 of the general assembly on 12 august 2010. UNODC has appointed a fund manager.

This article is missing how to contribute to the funds for human trafficking. They are missing more facts on the trust fund such as how the funds are attributes to the lives of those who went through human trafficking They also do not tell the proposals given.
Information that will be contributed to the existing article:
1. How you can volunteer and donate money to the funds. 
What sites can you donate through? Blue Heart Campaign 
What programs can help volunteer work?  Non-government organizations 
2. How these funds have helped victims 
How does the funds provide life contributions?  Essential assistance and protection
How does the funds help with trauma?  shelter, food, medical care, legal aid, access to justice, and psychosocial support 
3. Who is affected by the funds 
Where does the victim come from? 
The websites of information and site
Charidy.com/unvtf (charity academy) 
Unfoundation.org/how-to-help/donate/trust fund.html
Unodc.org/unodc/homepage 
unodc.org/unodc/en/human-trafficking-fund/2017-call-for-proposals--small-grants-facility
coordinationsud.org/financement/voluntary-trust-fund-for-victims-of-trafficking-in-persons-launches-3rd-call-for-proposals/Znewell (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]