User talk:Zionziho

Zionziho, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Zionziho! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2018

Hello, I'm Zubin12. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You need to stop adding a mention to a singular article with a subjective statement about the Singaporean education system Zubin12 (talk) 07:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent violations of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. (Swarm ♠ talk) 18:48, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zionziho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that I can contribute more to Wikipedia in terms of information/content, and promise not to violate Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View again. I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time and have contributed to its articles throughout. I will learn more about the Neutral Point of View, there are some articles in which I do not know I have violated the rules. So, please consider my appeal, thank you.

Decline reason:

This does not reasonably address the scope of the problems. The issue wasn't just your violations of WP:NPOV. In order to be unblocked, you'll need to clearly explain why your existing edits were inappropriate and how we can be sure you won't make such edits again. I'll warn you, given the history of your edits, you are likely going to have to agree to avoid editing about China in any way, broadly construed. Yamla (talk) 13:39, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zionziho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agree, my edits were partly biased because of my favourable opinion towards China over, for example, the Western world. It was due to the many biased media reports about Western countries over China and people distorting the good side of the country. I admit I haven't been neutral and tend to add a bit of flavour to sources to make the country appears better. However, i do believe that i've contributed to some truth too with some articles. I hope i can have a chance to prove that i can be honest with my edits too. And i promise i will no longer be adding in promotional content for China, and be constructive with my edits.

Decline reason:

No reply to 331dot in over a week. Please feel free to open a new request when you are able to communicate with us. SQL ^{Query me!} 16:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zionziho (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As Yamla said, you will need to agree to not edit about China in any way whatsoever, and tell what it is you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 08:56, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Zionziho. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:01, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]