User talk:Yourculturalscholar

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Yourculturalscholar. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Nick Barili, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 03:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and for the important guidelines regarding conflicts of interest. I appreciate the opportunity to clarify my involvement with the draft article for Nick Barili.

I would like to assure you that I do not have a conflict of interest in this case. While I am familiar with Nick Barili and his work, I do not have any personal, professional, or financial relationship with him that would influence my contributions to the article. My intention is solely to contribute to the accuracy and quality of the Wikipedia entry based on reliable, verifiable sources.

I have made every effort to adhere to Wikipedia’s content policies, and I am happy to make any necessary adjustments or engage in further discussion to ensure that the article maintains neutrality and complies with the community’s standards. If you believe any edits I have made need further review or clarification, I am open to feedback and willing to collaborate in the appropriate manner.

Thank you again for your vigilance and for upholding the integrity of Wikipedia’s content. I look forward to any further guidance or recommendations you may have. Yourculturalscholar (talk) 01:38, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Barili (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Barili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yourculturalscholar! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seen (series) has been accepted

Seen (series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]