User talk:Ynaps

December 2016

Hello, I'm Laser brain. An edit that you recently made to Om telolet om seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Laser brain (talk) 14:58, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ynaps/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Ynaps, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 12:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Samee was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ynaps/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 sami  ^talk 20:26, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ynaps/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Joshua Travagli. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Travagli

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joshua Travagli, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Joshua travagli

Wikipedia:Joshua travagli, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Joshua travagli and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Joshua travagli during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:51, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Ynaps, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:01, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Re: Joshua Travagli

In order to have an article on Wikipedia, a subject must meet certain inclusion criteria. For soccer players, there are two relevant guidelines. The general notability guideline says that a subject which has received significant coverage in reliable source is presumed to be notable. In the context of soccer, significant coverage does not include routine sports coverage such as match reports, player profiles, squad lists, transfer announcements etc. Since this is the only sort of coverage Travagli has received, he does not meet this guideline. The soccer-specific notability guideline says that any soccer player who has played a match in one of the fully professional leagues listed here or for his country's national team is presumed notable. Travagli has done neither, so he does not meet this guideline either. I hope that clarifies things. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:29, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Re: Sir Sputnik

i read all the guidelines and it says

1. Failing to meet the criteria in this guideline means that notability will need to be established in other ways
2. Please note that the failure to meet these criteria does not mean an article must be deleted;
3. A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject.
4. Players who have played, and managers who have managed in a fully professional league, will generally be regarded as notable.

i have read the terms and conditions and also all the guidelines and i found that this article can be on Wikipedia as he is notable. He has played professional matches and he has many independent sources to prove his records and information.

Even Joshua Travagli and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derrick_Etienne are same notable Please check again and allow this article to be published on Wikipedia.

Even we have article for

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefano_Bonomo
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC_(footballer)

which are less notable than this guy

User page

Please do not add templates and categories to your user page indicating you are an administrator, which you are not. It is also clear that you cannot communicate in English well enough to be writing articles on the English-language Wikipedia. Please consider contributing to the Wikipedia for your native language instead. --Laser brain (talk) 06:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Re: Laser_brain

sorry for using the template and regarding English i am good in this language. i am born in US and i have good knowledge about English and some other languages.

I'm not sure I believe you. --Laser brain (talk) 17:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Can you please review my article again, for Joshua travagli ? i am sure he is notable and he should be on Wikipedia.

Speedy deletion nomination of Joshua Travagli

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joshua Travagli, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:33, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Joshua Travagli, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly recreating articles that do not meet the notability guidelines is disruptive. I've already explained to you that for a footballer to be notable they must either have received coverage beyond routine sports coverage, or have played a match in one of the leagues listed at WP:FPL or their country's national team. Unless you can demonstrate that one of these things is the case, this article does not belong on the 'pedia. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ynaps/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua travagli (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeoffreyT2000 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joshua travagli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 18:17, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua Travagli (January 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joshua Travagli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:59, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joshua Travagli (March 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sir Sputnik was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joshua Travagli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joshua Travagli

Hello, Ynaps. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joshua Travagli".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ynaps/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 13:13, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ynaps, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 00:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)