User talk:Yitzhaac Pesach

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Yitzhaac Pesach! I am EivindJ and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! EivindJ (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk request

This is just a quick note to inform you that your question over at the helpdesk appears to be answered. Please let us know if this answers your question. Wikipedia:Help_desk#I_don.27t_understand Tiggerjay (talk) 18:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I answered you on User talk:EivindJ#Uploading --Eivind (t) 23:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so very much....really helpful...really appreciated it:)

EliteAnswers.com/EliteEmail

The article EliteAnswers.com/EliteEmail has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:19, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage

It appears that you may be working on an article for a company which to might be too closelty related to, before posting it to the main article space, please review: WP:COI; WP:CORP; WP:BFAQ -- to name a few -- also it may be better to simply WP:AFC. Best regards Tiggerjay (talk) 16:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EliteAnswers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:EliteAnswers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Article submission

A tag has been placed on Article submission, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ryanjunk (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Ryanjunk (talk) 18:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Eliteanswers.com

A tag has been placed on Eliteanswers.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ryanjunk (talk) 18:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Eliteanswers.com

I have nominated Eliteanswers.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliteanswers.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ryanjunk (talk) 20:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Eliteanswers.com

A tag has been placed on Eliteanswers.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 20:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EliteAnswers High Resolution.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:EliteAnswers High Resolution.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} My Articel keeps being removed and I don't know how to change it so that it gets accepteed, please help with specifics

It doesn't look quite that bad; I wouldn't have tagged it for speedy myself. However, I'm not convinced that it meets the notability criteria for websites, so I'll take it to articles for deletion just to gather a consensus. (This doesn't necessarily mean that the article will be deleted again, however.) Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:31, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly, what you need is reliable third party sources. Most of the sources are PR or self-reference, and aren't reliable as a result. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Eliteanswers.com

I have nominated Eliteanswers.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliteanswers.com (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Eliteanswers.com

A tag has been placed on Eliteanswers.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (talk) 11:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Eliteanswers.com, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf⁴² 14:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of EliteAnswers.com

A tag has been placed on EliteAnswers.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 20:31, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At this point I can't see any reason for this page. Most of the "references" about the company were self-referencing (Company writing about itself), and the some had not content in reference to the company, and the others were only tangental mentions, nothing really major about it. Maybe after WSJ or IT World writes an article due to the impressive technology employed by the company, et al. Also, remove the external links (They are all more or less ads for services of the company). More or less, from my gut feeling, this is a SEO attempt by the company. Also, take into account, this article has failed AfD twice as well. Maybe after the company does something notable other than spam email. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 21:03, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eliteanswers.com Edited

I tried to delete a lot of things that might be considered adevertising.

I wanted to know if you thought these edits would allow the page to be posted.

I realize you are quite busy, so if you are not the person I need to speak to about this, maybe you could direct me to the person who I do need to talk to about this.

My edits are visible on my user page.

Thanks for taking the timeYitzhaac Pesach (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like it. I see that it already has other editors complaining about it and with reason. It still looks like advertising to me with circular references (i.e. many of them not independent). Also I'd advise you to take that article out of your user page. It is fine to work on it on a sandbox (e.g. a page hanging off of your user page), but not as your user page itself. That is akin to advertising (i.e. spam) and will be challenged soon. I have not added a CSD tag on it due to the fact you just asked me to review it and I have only read it once a few minutes ago. Please remove it as per WP:USERPAGE. -- Alexf⁴² 21:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of EliteAnswers.com

I have nominated EliteAnswers.com, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EliteAnswers.com. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TravellingCari 02:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Helping out

Hello! I will try to get to your article later this week or next week -- real life is sort of getting in the way of my Wiki fun. I will say, however, that the best way to save this subject is to keep it as a stub (at least initially). There is nothing wrong with having a stub online -- in this case, less can be more. Thanks. Ecoleetage (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I am doing research on the company and I coming up with two different names. Is it Eliteweb Inc. or is it EliteAnswers.com? Thanks Ecoleetage (talk) 19:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! I just got back from a mini-vacation and I will get to this in the coming week. Cheers! Ecoleetage (talk) 22:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]