User talk:XAGENTXVECTORX
January 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Resident Evil (video game) with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 22:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
XAGENTXVECTORX (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
this is not fair and its because of me at least that the release dates for at least 1 of the Resident Evil articles is up to date I put alot hard work on it and its unjust for me to be blocked all this sockpuppetering nonsense is ridiculous Im not harming anything you saw it you know my sources are right its not vandalism and you're saying by expressing my opinion and I'm wrong?!! what is wrong with people these days I need to be taken off this "unblock" ive been unjustly put on im not disrupting anything "ITS FACT" all my info is "sourced" and as accurate as possible if i see I for got something or something i need to update or make an edit i do it just like everyone else who uses this, I demand to be taken of this block im not putting wrong info or messing up the article I'm making it better and more informative believe me it helped me and others alot ive been told so I know im not doing a bad job but it seems all the hard work and hours I put in to research and edit is being thrown in my face when actually alot of users here base their edits on some of our info especially the releases believe me many people I guess in a way try to at least copy and paste my edits and put on their own edits...thats fine..I mean its a double edged sword thins you know its not really right to take credit on edits I worked so hard on its just not nice but I also understand copy is the biggest form of flattery and people do use my info for their own benefit which is i guess good n bad but its helping people i know that 4 sure so when im told that we r vandalzing its insulting because vandalzing and harrassment is something you should look othe users doing cause thats definitely not me but theres a reason why we have the option to contact one another and explain our doings...some ppl here just want to mess up the website and put BS n fake info...Im not like that I worked hard doing these edits and they dont affect the article whatsoever it actually strengthens it as a whole and some users appreciate the edits I at least made so unless Im harming the website theres no reason why I should be blocked...my hard work editing this articles speaks for it self..think about it if other editors here are basing their own edits based on my own hard worked information dont you think people Im hoping are appreciating in a way what I have done!??? does that look like like a so called vandalism,sockpuppetering or harrassment to you !??? why am I here ? to help myself as well as others thats why you guys need to worry about people who are actually putting wrong infomation and want to purposely harm the website but thats not me at all, Im not violating anything and all the user names that we are being accused of using im not sure if you can base that on an IP address alon and all the users that have used that said IP address but im legit and whatever proof you guys may have is irrelevant because it doesnt pertain to me I'm not taking a blame for anybody else and we all do edits in a similar way and try to improvise/update or add certain information, thats the whole point of this website we all contribute and its becuase of the majority of the non-admin users that this website is still alive, if it wasnt for poeple like me and millions of others wikipedia wouldnt be as succesful and popular as it is now, Im a good person of good moral and i dont deserve to be blockedmy contributions speak for themselvs and we all dothings our own way . thats fine to each their own but dont critize other people's work or block them just becuase they have a different way of doing things you wouldnt like it if i was like that to u would you? so unblock me becuase you dont have any negative actions I did on articles I edited this is more like selective decision because I know many here who just want to hurt the website by putting wrong info which makes it harder for the good ones like me to edit so if you can accept people like that to edit then I shouldnt even be here in this "BLOCK" i have nothing to hide at all all our edits are here saved on the website so what to hide? my edits are good, if someone doesnt like it ,fine thats their opinion you dont see me whining for people doing their own edits, thats their own way of doing things, thats ok I have my own way other people have a similar or totaly different or unique way of doing thins thats what makes us human and not robots we all have our own way of freemdom of speech and expression so let me express my self which is not "harming" anyone the only thing i can think of is for people who have the authority to block someone whos good is because of many things. some good others bad and one thing thats common is sad to say is envy and I know for a fact that thats at least one reason people are blocked and thats not the right reason to block someone, we r all creative in our own way Im not saying its u just in general so ive been writing too much now so you talk to the other zillion of admins and you tell me if Im not helping the articles or website in general I know at least quite a few admins will agree with the contributions ive made here alone, i dont want to keep getting responses from osiris v or whoever telling us whats right and whats wrong its our edits not theirs they have their own version so do we and millions of us here.I hope you can reply ASAP because wikipedia is one of the websites i use most frequently i pretty much find out alot of things from just wikipedia alone lol so im obviously a good user and editor so just g et me off this block asap and get those admins who r really the harrassers out of our backs and let us do our work which is actually helping the article and website as a whole in general.....tahnk you...hope to hear from u very soon and one more note: just because people have a certain condition of anything or have some kind of authaurity or because they take their own personal dislikes in life doesnt mean you have to take it on people and take advantage or abuse your authority as an admin because of it, dont blame the world because of other people or your own personal problems or unhappiness, etc. in life not directly towards you ofcourse im just speaking in general and Im sorry for Osirus V condition ive read it...im sorry but its not right because of it to abuse your authority for it
Decline reason:
Next time, try reading WP:GAB before creating an unblock request - the above is WP:TLDNR, presents attacks, and shows you've never actually read most of the policies you agreed to. First: WP:RS - what is an what is not a reliable source is important. Second, WP:CONSENSUS is vital: if the consensus is that your edit is wrong, then it's wrong until you convince others on the article talkpage. We have a bold, revert, discuss cycle: you don't keep re-adding because you magically hold the WP:TRUTH. Don't even get me going WP:SOCK - it's an absolute no-no, as is WP:EVADE. You're fortunate that I'm not removing access to this talkpage for your nastiness above (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:02, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.