User talk:Worldbruce/Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Barry Brewer Article Submission

WorldBruce,

Thank you for your review of my draft. I received your notes and am writing to state that I am in no way a paid advocate and I am not receiving any form of compensation for this article, directly or indirectly. It is not clear to me what edits led to that conclusion, but my recent edits were all made to accommodate the suggestions of the last member who reviewed the original submission back in November, Captain Eek. Please let me know if there is any further information I need to provide or additional edits I need to make in order to have this article approved.

Thank you, MichaelMonet44 Michaelmonet44 (talk) 04:32, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Your recent edit on a page

Hello WorldBruce,

Greetings. You have recently removed the Pakistan Movement category from the page Khabeeruddin Ahmed. You have claimed that Pakistan Movement began after his death in 1939. Would you kindly clarify what you think as the beginning of the Pakistan Movement, and why so. And who were the leaders. Why you believe, the movement began at some point after March 1939 with no root prior to that time?

In our view, Pakistan Movement didn't suddenly start after March 1939. The movement only culminated in 1947 with roots going back many decades before that. In addition, Rajshahi constituency was about 1/4 of the then Eastern Bengal.

Looking forward to hearing back from you. Thank you. Afzal_tc8 Afzal_tc8 (talk) 14:04, 6 January 2020 (PDT)

Please clarify what you mean by "our". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Your username should not be shared by multiple individuals.

As to Khabeeruddin Ahmed, what I (or you, singular or plural) think, believe, or feel about him and the Pakistan Movement is immaterial. What matters is what reliable sources for history say on the issue. If you want to add content to Wikipedia, whether in the form of prose or membership in categories, the burden to demonstrate verifiability is on you. If you can cite historians knowledgable about the Pakistan Movement who say that he was a leader of it, then you may add him to Category:Leaders of the Pakistan Movement. Otherwise, you may not.

I don't see the relevance of the size of the Rajshahi constituency. --Worldbruce (talk) 05:19, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		Bangladesh Barnstar
		Keep it up and let me know if you need any assistance. UserNumber (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Resubmitted: Draft:Royal and Venerable Confraternity of the Most Blessed Sacrament of Mafra

Hi User talk:Worldbruce, can you please re-read and reevaluate. I believe it is to standard now? Thanks Melroross (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

It's in the queue to be reviewed. Someone is likely to get to it in the next 2-3 weeks. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Pending review unattended to

Hello all. This is actually directed to world Bruce . I had an article submitted for over two weeks now and it is still pending and unreviewed. The article is a BLP 'KUNLE ADE-OJO'

It has been there unattended to even after meeting the reviewer's requirements. Please I don't know what is going on. Is it that Wikipedia is that tough that getting through becomes practically impossible? Niftyrules™ 07:31, 29 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niftyrules (talk • contribs)

Question about WP:RX item received

Hi Worldbruce, thanks so much for the article you just sent me via Gale online. Question(s): (1) Is there any way to determine what the page numbers are in the hard copy? (2) Extra credit: Was there any indication that there is an even later edition of IDCH that has yet another update for PetSmart?

You can reply via your wiki email (I've repeated these questions in a reply to you), or here if you ping me.

Thanks again, Softlavender (talk) 07:07, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

@Softlavender: (1) Not short of going to a library that holds a hard copy and looking. I'm not sure what the point would be. WP:PAGENUM says to use other means of identifying the relevant section, which in reference works is usually the name of the entry, i.e. PetSmart. (2) No, there's no indication of a more recent edition. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Shahbazpur Town, Brahmanbaria and Anailkota

Hi Bruce. I've declined several CSD requests related to the above pages because the requests didn't specify any valid CSD criteria.

I can't really tell whether the requesting editor is attempting to sort out some mess or is being disruptive as their requests were unclear and the page history is confusing; I further note that you've already done some patrolling there recently and probably understand what is going on. Would you mind taking another look? --kingboyk (talk) 00:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

@Kingboyk: Oh no, not them again. I've opened Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Armaanaziz. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Oh dear. I shall watch with interest. Thanks for acting. --kingboyk (talk) 01:42, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

PS I imagine you will want to dispute their PROD at Shahbazpur, Brahmanbaria. --kingboyk (talk) 01:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Dear Worldbruce, a permanent solution to this requires your cooperation. There will be no problem if you can redirect. I've redirected. MargNely (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

SPI closed, with a block. Thanks again. --kingboyk (talk) 19:34, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Dictionary of Women Artists: Laura Elizabeth Rachel Troubridge m Adrian Hope

Hi WorldBruce. I don't know where to find an email address for you. Cdefm (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

@Cdefm: When you're on someone's talk page, like this one, there's an "email this user" link in the left-hand panel. It's possible that you need to have an email address of your own set up in Preferences > Notifications in order to use the feature. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:49, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Worldbruce. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Cdefm (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...

helpfulness
... you were recipient no. 2148 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

Bangladesh Liberation war

would you mind to take a look on this article as you are regular and I can't be here for short of time! and dont take it as canvassing just saw today some unbleveable POV pushing there!! when it was revolutionary liberation war some people manipulate the inbox by using some indian sources as if radical right group propagate there as the victory was an indian affaire only - funny and how on earth can anyone accept such biased propaganda on Wikipedia !! it seems radical keyboard warrior reached here too!! do you know who is responsible for quality edits control on wikipedia !! care at least this page!! thanks in advance --2A0A:A546:248B:0:B191:907E:42F9:C297 (talk) 12:44, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Comment

Hi, if possible please comment here. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 07:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Untitled post

I`m not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Imunify360

@SergeyImunify360: This is the wrong place to answer; any reply belongs on your user page and/or your talk page. Also, any reply needs to be clear, instead of saying both that you are paid, and that you are not paid. Regardless of whether you are paid or not (and Wikipedia interprets paid very broadly in this context, unpaid interns, for example, are still considered paid for these purposes), you should explain your connection to the company. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:17, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

tks

Lemme know if those additions/corrections work for you. If you don't have a source, I can probably send it. Tks. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Carlo Masi Bio help

First of all I am not sure this is where I am supposed to talk to you about this, so if I am wrong please forgive me. I changed a lot the biography and now is almost entirely based on a biography of Carlo Masi (Ruggero Freddi) written by Strega Prize winner Walter Siti, who is one of the most important Italian writers alive. This biography is a book published by Rizzoli Libri one of the most important Italian publishers. Apart from the book I use as a source Xbiz and here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pornography#Sources it says it is reliable. I use as a source also la Repubblica, La Stampa, Il Giornale and Corriere della Sera which are the most important Italian national news papers, very reliable and authoritative. Moreover I used Attitude (magazine), Times Higher Education, Gay Star News, Vanity Fair (magazines) and Vice (magazine) but mostly in the "media attention" part. Finally, I gave the link to the segment of the tv show where he asked his partner to marry him. Every single article I cite here is entirely on Carlo Masi (Ruggero Freddi) apart from the review of theater show he did, but even there his name is in bold and he is the main character.

As a porn star he was one of the most important and he was definitely the most important at Colt Studio Group, the company he worked for, in fact he is the only one ever named "emeritus" and he is the cover man of the 40th anniversary celebrative book of the company. Apart from the porn career his theater debut rose a lot of attention among critics and media. Moreover, media from all around the world have spoken about him when he become a professor for one of the most prestigious university in Italy, Sapienza University of Rome.

I don't know if this makes any difference but his biography is present in the Spanish (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Masi) , Italian (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Masi), Polish (https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Masi), French(https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlo_Masi) and Korean (https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%B9%B4%EB%A5%BC%EB%A1%9C_%EB%A7%88%EC%8B%9C) wikipedia(I didn't use any of them as source).

Can you please give me some advise on how to improve it and tell me how I can unblock it to submit it again for publication? --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 13:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @AlejandroLeloirRey: please stop posting this request on multiple talk pages. You have posted the same request to several talk pages, the help desk, the Teahouse and the article's talk page. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@Worldbruce: I am sorry, I thought they were separated things from where i could gather information. I am very puzzled and i don't know what is not working. i didn't mean to be inpolite. should I delete this and the other posts? --AlejandroLeloirRey (talk) 15:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Desktop improvements prototype

Hello, Worldbruce!

Thanks for taking the time to participate in the user feedback round for our desktop improvements prototype. This feedback is super valuable to us and is currently being used to determine our next steps. We have published a report gathering the main takeaways from the feedback and highlighting the changes we’ll make based on this feedback. Please take a look and give us your thoughts on the talk page of the report. To learn more about the project overall and the other features we’re planning on building in the future, check out the main project page.

SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 12:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

User:PaulanerPassau Draft:DLocal

Dear Wordlbruce, thank you for your time and your comments on my talk site User:PaulanerPassau. My intention is - and always has been - to closely follow the Wikipedia rules. I already included the discloser that I am writing for dLocal. And I also read the articles for creation process I am not sure how to proceed now though: It says to submit for review so that other editors can write/finish the proposed article, am I right there? Should I submit it again now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PaulanerPassau (talk • contribs) 14:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi Worldbruce, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Changing Institutions name

Hey man! Why you’ve changed the name of my institution! If there is no proper link or news can I provide about that change, tho who have gave you the right of changing it! Adil 1201 (talk) 09:36, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

@Adil 1201: I didn't revert the change you made to the name, that was two other editors, Érico and 17jiangz1. I explained on your talk page why they were right to do so, and what was wrong with you changing it. Remember, verifiability, not truth.

One of the conventions for using talk pages is that you should keep a discussion on the page where it starts instead of fragmenting it over multiple pages. So if you still have questions about this, continue the thread at User talk:Adil 1201#June 2020. If you want a particular editor to notice your posting there, use a notification template as described in Help:Talk pages#Notifications. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. I've understood this things properly. Adil 1201 (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Thank you for your supportive comments at Talk:Sounds Fake But Okay I have removed the page from my watchlist, but keep getting pinged back, there is so much hostility from the friend of the articles subject that I have no wish to be further involved. Theroadislong (talk) 18:12, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Reversions/roll forwards caused template issues?

Hi WB,

When you were fixing the AFCHD template (or possibly just a hidden flaw of the initial action), the edit comment option for the 28th June onwards have disappeared, at least for me. Could you confirm and see if there's a resolution? Nosebagbear (talk) 12:52, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Nosebagbear: Sorry, you caught it in the middle of the multiple steps required to fix what happens when someone (or in this case two someones) inadvertently removes the end of a template. It should all be working now, with all the questions and answers restored. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Weekly Television Digest

Hi Bruce! I am currently overhauling the article about the Odyssey video game in German Wikipedia. I need to check two publications you may have access to (no way to get these in German libraries):

"Maggie's 'Mystery Product' - TV Fun & Games" Weekly Television Digest, May 15, 1972, p. 7 and "Odyssey, Magnavox's Electronic Game" Weekly Television Digest, September 18, 1972, p. 10

I am looking forward to your reply, Schnurrikowski (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

@Schnurrikowski: There is a library near me that has volume 12, but it has been closed since mid-March, and it doesn't look like it will reopen to the public before January 2021. You may ask me again then, but instead I suggest you ask at WP:RX, since different parts of the world are responding to the pandemic differently. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:24, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for quick reply. I will give it a try at WP:RX. Best regards, Schnurrikowski (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)

Syeda Wahida Sabrina

Hello! I just saw you made a Wikipedia page for me and I’m truly grateful for that! I really appreciate it a lot and think it’s amazing! However, there are a few edits that you need to make which I was unable to suggest on the page due to my limited knowledge of Wikipedia editing. If you could so kindly edit the few things below: 1. I have two National Film Awards, one for Gangajatra and another for Antardhan, the pictures of which I can email you if you provide me with it! 2. I would highly appreciate it if you could add one of my pictures to the page! Hope you will provide me with a way to contact you! Please see this as a request and recognise my gratitude for your kind consideration!

Best Regards, Syeda Wahida Sabrina Sw sabrina (talk) 20:18, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

@Sw sabrina: I can't take credit for creating the article, I was just the most recent editor to make a small change to it. I've added the National Film Award for Antardhan, which was reported in various newspapers.

You may upload a photo of yourself. It's one of the few ways that Wikipedia encourages people to contribute to articles about themselves. Be aware, however, that by doing so you're granting everyone, not just Wikipedia, a license to use that photo. It should be a picture you hold the copyright to, in other words one you took yourself, a selfie. It can't be a publicity photo where the copyright is held by the studio photographer, production company, or another entity. There is a way to use photos taken by family or friends, with their permission, but documenting that permission is more complicated.

Go to Commons:First steps and carefully step through the tutorial. When you get to "First steps/Uploading files", don't dive in too hastily. First follow the link on that page to learn about the different licensing options. Other useful advance reading includes Wikipedia:File names and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images, which will prepare you to answer important questions the upload wizard will ask you. A longer explanation can be found at Wikipedia:A picture of you. If after that you have any questions or doubts, Commons has its own help desk.

After you have uploaded an image to Wikimedia Commons, you may leave a note here with the file name, and I'll add it to Syeda Wahida Sabrina if it's suitable. --Worldbruce (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

please fix your script

I like that you are converting |title= to |script-title= but ...

With this edit your script added |work= when the template already had |website=. These two parameters are aliases so when more than one of these aliases appears in a cs1|2 template, cs1|2 doesn't know what to do so it picks one and also emits an error message. In this example, overwriting |website= with |work= is, no doubt, the proper fix.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 16:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Regarding notability

All her movies has been released n its pages is also there request to re review Vamb30 (talk) 01:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

@Vamb30: Huh? If English is not your first language, you may find it more effective to contribute to one of Wikipedia's other language versions. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Revisions to Draft:Azazus, please review for move to article

I removed the Genius and MusicBrainz source from the Draft article. I also reexplained in the second Lead sentence about why my Draft is Notable to be an official Wiki article. I do believe the sources provided holds weight regarding this Draft to be moved. If by chance you still feel it is not notable, please direct me on how i should condense the draft to only the sources already there that you feel is strongly credible to make this a live article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Azazus Thank you Azazus (talk) 15:17, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Azazus has been blocked indefinitely per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TikTokJournalist. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 00:17, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

review a draft Article

Hi, Worldbruce Good Morning. Please can you review a draft article on [here]. I hope its pass WP:VICTIM , WP:N ,WP:NSOLDIER & per WP:MILPEOPLE. In Bangladesh his Murder issue trending news thousands of news available on Bangladesh and internationally. I request to you please help this article. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.231.23.254 (talk) 00:59, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

review

Kindly review this edit. I remove some text from the article because it's not related to article as article isn't a biography. But this user reverting it. If i'm wrong, advice me. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 20:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

@আফতাবুজ্জামান: Thanks for asking. The tone and depth of the text felt wrong to me too. How much background to include is a matter of editorial judgement. If it had been written in the author's own words and had cited a range of independent sources, I might have given the author more discretion, perhaps trimming it or copyediting instead of removing it entirely. But the history sections were a copyright violation, nearly entirely a derivative translation of the school's official website. An administrator has deleted the offending revisions, and the author has been admonished.

If the author can find a couple independent sources containing significant coverage (perhaps you could help search?) I'd be willing to help them write a few neutral paragraphs. Otherwise the article, with no independent sources, likely will have to be merged to Patiya Upazila. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Talk about Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School

Aftabuzzaman, a Wikipedian, quoted Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School as saying that a biography of the founder was given on the page, removing two-thirds of the school's establishment history without proper review. He is still doing the same thing over and over again without reviewing the page, even after editing and returning it with the previous content. As a Wikipedian, he is re-emerging in the battle of counter-editing with one tag after another without properly adding-subtracting-reviewing the content & he prevented me from editing the Abdus Sobhan Rahat Ali High School page. At this point I will edit the history of the school without highlighting the biography of the founder on that page. We hope that in the future, before removing content from a page in the words of a Wikipedian, you will read the contents of the whole page and review the additions and deletions properly. --FAHAD CARE (talk) 19:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you so much for all your enormous contributions as a WikiGnome and the valuable resources you provide at WP:RX. Zayeem (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Snook

Many thanks for that; very interesting.

I'd like to put it in Wikisource, but for that I need a PDF or image; can you send one, please? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

No, I can't within the terms under which I accessed the material. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:27, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Fair enough. Are you able to tell me where that was, so I can try other avenues? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:09, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Request on 20:06:13, 5 October 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Ceefrop

• Ceefrop (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:DFD Music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The nitpicking here is ridiculous and childish. Instrumentalists are producers. Songwriters are producers. You don't get added to credits of albums, especially those distributed by major distributors (such as Empire), unless you got points on the record, wrote it and played instruments. Hence, a producer. Billboard doesn't write about anyone. You have to meet a myriad of criteria to make a Billboard chart and to receive the recognition. This is a Billboard charting production duo with credits on notable albums and artists. At what do you realize you are being petty and this needs to be approved?

Ceefrop (talk) 20:06, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia's standards are set by the community of editors who contribute here. As an editor, you have a voice in setting those standards. If you feel that producers should have a carveout in the notability guidelines for musicians, the place to discuss that is Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). The present consensus, however, is that Wikipedia should not have an article about DFD Music. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:51, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

RE: Declare any connection (BugHerd)

Hi User:Worldbruce

I am very new to this indeed. Thank you for all the information, you have put this in a far clearer way than I have been able to find in the past. I have worked with the company I created the page for, so have followed your guidelines for adding the disclosure as recommended to Draft:BugHerd. I have found such varied information on the web about article creation, and it did not seem ethical to pay a third-party to create an article on my behalf as a subject matter expert. I was unaware of the Articles for creation page though, which I could explore as an alternative avenue?

Thanks again

ChanieH (talk) 00:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Request for assistance

Hi I'm pretty new to the system of creating articles and hope you might take a look at one that I've submitted Patrick McGrath (Irish Republican). Last month the article was returned and it was suggested that more information on notability be added. I've done that and hope it now meets standards. I appreciate any insight you might offer. Thanks, Palisades1 (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2020 (UTC) Draft:Patrick McGrath (Irish Republican)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	This user is doing a wonderful job and helping people in the creation of new articles. Rashid Jorvee (talk) 10:49, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Fixed (?) botched update to Sanskrit

I wasn't exactly sure what you meant by the reference error introduced into the Sanskrit article. I fixed a red-letter warning about group=lower-alpha references. Could you please re-check the article, to make sure I've fixed the problem you spotted? And thank-you for alerting me to the problem. Astro-Tom-ical (talk) 03:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Astro-Tom-ical: That's the issue (Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting) that I had in mind. Before your 12 October edit, the text "Mallory and Adams illustrate the resemblance with the following ..." and the table following it displayed in the notes section. Now they're in the text of the article. So your solution isn't what the author had in mind, but we can leave it to them to readjust. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you. About the "promoted" footnote: Yes; I couldn't get the table to display in the footnote, so I figured it was a good example to move into the text. (Sensible evidence rather than scholarly opinion.) Astro-Tom-ical (talk) 05:32, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry, you reverted my reversion of your edit, before I Could Cite Rahman's birth name etc.--Suborno Sabbir (talk) 07:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Rashid Askari article [tone] disputed

I want to improve this article. Which section is disputed, What do you think ? Please help me for improving that? I want to contribute Islamic University, Bangladesh related article, If you kind to help me ! Prodipto Deloar (Say) UTC 12:56, 03/12/2020

@Prodipto Deloar: It's good that you want to fix the article's problems, but people with a connection to the topic are very rarely able to correct problems of neutrality and tone. You would have a better chance of success with an academic biography to which you have no connection, perhaps one of: Abdul Mannan Choudhury, M. Feroze Ahmed, M Harunur Rashid, Nasir Uddin (anthropologist), or Shariff Enamul Kabir.

I usually start by examining each source. Remove all that are not reliable. Minimize the use of sources that are primary or not independent. Search for additional independent, reliable, secondary sources to ensure that all points of view are fairly represented. Next go through the text line by line and discard anything that is not supported by an inline citation (unless it's common knowledge, like Dhaka is the capital of Bangladesh). Attribute opinion inline, don't express it in Wikipedia's voice.

Wikipedia:Writing better articles and Wikipedia:Article development give more guidance. Success at neutrality and tone editing also requires very high fluency in English, something that could take you years to achieve, and so is beyond the scope of help I can provide. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

The Andy Williams Christmas Album

I still need a reference for something in this article. Also, someone has taken control of the The Twelve Days of Christmas (song) article and insists on a strict interpretation of Wikipedia rules, which prevents certain important information from getting into the article.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:58, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Requesting some minor peer-review

Hi Worldbruce. I know this isn't Bangladesh related, but I was wondering—assuming you aren't busy, of course—if you could check over this edit I made to economy of Pakistan. It's in a similar vein of edits as the one that you caught my mistake on a few days ago, so hopefully this request isn't too out-there. I'm somewhat more confident that there shouldn't be any issues with it, so please don't feel any pressure to look into it if you have more important things to do. Perryprog (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

I've audited the infobox through the line for bank rate. Your changes looks good, but I radically trimmed the list of trade organizations (hardly any of which are mentioned in the body of the article), removed the unsourced phrase "Newly-industrialized (By 2025)" which I couldn't find in the source and looks like nationalistic boosterism, and replaced an out-of-date source for bank rate. I'll keep checking when I have the energy. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:08, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Many thanks; the infobox was definitely getting a bit long. Does the e/f in "19/20f" and "19/20e" stand for forecast and estimate, respectively? And does the form used just depend on how the source refers to it, or is there a more specific distinction between them?

Cheers, and happy holidays.

Perryprog (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Talk page comments

Hi Worldbruce,

I apologise if my comments appeared uncivil. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMomen88 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Cabinet of Bangladesh

Hi Worldbruce,

Apologies for the misunderstanding on Cabinet of Bangladesh. My intention was to close the request as it is now obvious to me that it will not receive sufficient support for a name change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMomen88 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8