Jump to content

User talk:Winuserunlimited

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello.Winuserunlimited (talk) 20:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Winuserunlimited, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Winuserunlimited! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Duferco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:54, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, get a grip on some of these noms.

[edit]

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Winuserunlimited (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is the only account I'm using in months, can I be unblocked? Or how can I contribute to wikipedia? My old account was blocked cause it was identified as a sockpuppet and IT WAS NOT, it was the same static ip (same office shared with the user) and the same article (the city where we live). Winuserunlimited (talk) 18:24, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked as a sockpuppet so you felt that the best way to prove you were not a sockpuppet was to create another account to evade the block on your previous account? That's sockpuppetry and it's not allowed. only (talk) 02:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.