User talk:Wildlover22

See below ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of social nudity places in Europe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 03:18, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of social nudity places in Europe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dr. K. 03:19, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at List of social nudity places in Europe, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please stop adding links on section headers. It is not allowed. Dr. K. 03:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at List of social nudity places in North America. Dr. K. 03:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Wildlover22! Thank you for your contributions. I am ToBeFree and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of wikilinks

Hi Wildlover22, thank you for adding wikilinks to the first occurrence of important words. I think that edits such as Special:Diff/908916837 are useful.

Some users have complained about the addition of wikilinks to section headings, but you seem to have noticed the complaints on your talk page and are not doing this anymore. I note that the complaints above have been mostly unspecific; only the third message finally contained an explanation, in italics at the end.

What made me personally raise an eyebrow is that for each of these wikilink additions, there has been a separate edit. One edit for Cyprus, one edit for Greece, one edit for the Netherlands, one edit for Canada, one edit for Brazil, and so forth. All of these edits have been made using a mobile device, and the mobile Wikipedia design seems to encourage this behavior. However, making 100 edits to add 100 links can be confusing for other editors. It has confused me, for example.

Some articles on Wikipedia can only be edited by "extended confirmed" users who have made 500 edits and have been registered for 30 days. Adding unnecessary wikilinks to articles might sometimes be done by people who are trying to circumvent this restriction. To me, the mass addition of wikilinks looked suspicious in this regard. I should have been assuming good faith instead.

To greatly reduce the amount of time needed to do these edits, if possible, please try making them on a desktop computer instead. This allows you to edit the whole page at once easily, instead of having to click the pencil button for each section. In Special:Diff/908911416, you have done this nicely using a mobile device, but that has likely required you to click an "edit" link that is inconveniently hidden in the edit history. On a desktop computer, it is much easier to do this.

Thank you very much. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of social nudity places in North America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Riverside

List of social nudity places in South America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Santa Catarina

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of social nudity places in North America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverside (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carnival Sunshine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 04:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naked and Afraid XL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ramu (disambiguation) and Seminole (disambiguation)

Please note that disambiguation pages like Ramu (disambiguation) and Seminole (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 17:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of social nudity places in South America. Dr. K. 01:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Dr. K. 02:07, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

- Donald Albury 13:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

You are adding wikilinks to commonly understood words, such as naked, hoax, and stampede. This is not helpful, for the reasons explained at WP:OVERLINK. Please only link nouns that are likely to be unfamiliar to readers of the article. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 23:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This notice also applies to you "edits" to World Trade Center (1973-2001). Please stop now. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 12:58, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bald Mountain

Please note that disambiguation pages like Bald Mountain are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 23:25, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of Naked and Afraid episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Black bear

Naked and Afraid XL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sting

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of social nudity places in Europe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Santa Cruz, Cartagena, Portman, Motrico, San Agustín, Villaviciosa, Solsona, Isla, Cobas, Mera, Seira, Oropesa, Somo, Cabanes, Vallcarca and Ajo

List of Naked and Afraid episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Black bear

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of social nudity places in Europe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Villaviciosa, Solsona, Seira and Oropesa

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freikörperkultur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elysian Fields (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Rottweiler. Graham87 02:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Southern blue-ringed octopus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oceana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Rescuers Down Under, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in List of social nudity places in Oceania. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. As you have been told many times, it is against MOS:LINKSTYLE to put links in section headings. If there is some reason you feel compelled to keep doing this, it might be good to get help from someone. —VeryRarelyStable 04:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of social nudity places in Oceania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Port Philip (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes. You have been warned repeatedly and asked to discuss the issue. You have ignored all discussion. You were asked to comment on an administrators' noticeboard about your edits. You ignored it and were blocked.

Despite all of this, you have continued to add pointless links to articles and editing to emphasize your apparent obsession with nudity.

It is time to figure it out. If you do not understand why your edits are disruptive, now is your last chance to ask for help. Edit this page and ask for clarification about anything you do not understand.

If you continue to edit otherwise, you will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 05:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

really? Wildlover22 (talk) 00:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Really. Which part do you not understand? - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:57, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

none Wildlover22 (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OVERLINK

You have been repeatedly asked to abide by WP:OVERLINK and -- if you disagree or do not understand -- to discuss the issue. Your recent edit at Greystoke: The Legend of Tarzan, Lord of the Apes demonstrates that you either cannot understand or have no intention of addressing the issue. Similarly, with past issues you seem to have no understanding of the problems or no intention of addressing the concerns.

I have asked for you to be blocked from editing again. Typically, blocks become progressively longer each time you are blocked. If you decide to return to editing after this block, you will need to either address the issues by discussing them or changing your behavior. If you do not, I will be asking that you be blocked indefinitely from editing. - SummerPhD^v2.0 19:23, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the List of Naked and Afraid episodes article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. [1][2] - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:36, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at List of social nudity places in Oceania. —VeryRarelyStable 23:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Titanic (1997 film), you may be blocked from editing. As you've already been advised repeatedly to be more judicious in your linking, it's disappointing that you're apparently continuing to create links that do not add context/meaning. DonIago (talk) 02:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding unsourced content to multiple articles, and STOP OVERLINKING common words. Netherzone (talk) 00:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Jordan Hot Springs, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop overlinking WP:OVERLINK common words in the encyclopedia, you have been warned numerous times about this over the years. Netherzone (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Forrest Gump edit

Please could I ask you why you added that Lieutenant Dan's wife was Vietnamese in the cast list of Forrest Gump? I reverted that description of her because I wasn't sure if you were editing in good faith but I kept everything else. If you explain why you added that in, I may self-revert. 92.0.35.8 (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Is there some reason why you feel it is necessary to provide links to common words and place names in every article? Regardless, be notified that these edits will continue to be reverted. —VeryRarelyStable 03:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thor: Love and Thunder. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —El Millo (talk) 03:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Official residence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Front.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of The Mummy (film series) characters into Demigod. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 01:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. In a recent edit to the page World War II, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wuxing (Chinese philosophy), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 00:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Link piping

Please read WP:NOTBROKEN. If a wikilink is already pointing to the correct article, it is not necessary or recommended to make edits that simply alter links to point directly to the target article. For example, Fujiwara family already redirects to Fujiwara clan, so this sort of edit is not necessary. Yamato dynasty already redirects to Imperial House of Japan, so this edit is not necessary. You are performing a large volume of these edits very quickly. Please take a step back to determine whether these changes are useful. Dekimasuよ! 17:59, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since the last message you are continuing to alter links that are WP:NOTBROKEN, including here, here, here, and here, among others. This sort of editing is disruptive and your talk page and editing history shows little evidence that you are reading or accepting the feedback of other editors (WP:LISTENTOUS). Be advised that if this continues you will face a block for long-term disruption without further warning. Dekimasuよ! 02:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits, including persistent alterations to links that are not broken since the previous warning, such as here, here, here, here, and here.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dekimasuよ! 17:36, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You just came off a week block for disregarding WP:NOTBROKEN, and it seems like 90% of your edits have been to make the same types of edits to pipe links. Please stop. I know you know that this user talk page exists as you've edited it in the past, so it seems the only logical conclusion is that you are willfully ignoring the advice that other editors are leaving you here. Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wildlover22, you have continued this form of disruptive editing following both the previous block and the warning above from Aoi. Please be aware that if you do not stop this disruption, the next step will be an indefinite partial block from the article namespace until you show an intention to communicate with other editors and stop this activity. Dekimasuよ! 00:01, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wildlover22, thank you for communicating with me politely on my talk page. You wrote, "because of the redirect links so I have to fix them. That's the reason, so don't block me indefinite while I'm fixing it." However, what I and other editors have been trying to explain to you is that links that redirects that get readers to the correct articles should not be "fixed". Wikipedia:Redirect says that Redirects aid navigation and searching by allowing a page to be reached under alternative titles and It is almost never helpful to replace [[redirect]] with [[target|redirect]]. This is an editing guideline on the English Wikipedia, which means all editors are expected to follow it in normal circumstances. I do appreciate your communication, but you still must stop editing links that are working redirects. Dekimasuよ! 04:16, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing the article namespace because your account is primarily being used to make disruptive edits that conflict with editing guidelines, and you have not changed this behavior. You are free to edit talk pages or pages in other namespaces to propose useful changes at this time, if you wish to show that you intend to accept feedback and stop making unnecessary changes to WP:NOTBROKEN links. Many of your edits are helpful, but disregarding the warnings of a large number of other editors is not acceptable. Please be aware that if the disruptive editing is carried over to other namespaces then this will be converted to a sitewide block.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dekimasuよ! 00:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your second edit after your message was a change to a WP:NOTBROKEN link. Atami, Shizuoka redirects to Atami, so the link does not need to be changed to Atami. Each time you make this sort of unnecessary change, it appears on the watchlists of a large number of editors, many of whom will check on the appropriateness of the edit. This wastes the time and energy of other editors. You also did this in your third edit, altering a link to Four Symbols (China) to read Four Symbols and a link reading White Tiger (China) to White Tiger (mythology). And these kinds of edits have been mixed in with others since that time. This is a WP:LISTEN problem. You can use an unblock request to edit in the mainspace once you can show you understand the editing guidelines and will follow them. Best, Dekimasuよ! 00:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wildlover22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My reason is that I have unfinished business to do Wildlover22 (talk) 20:59, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 23:02, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]