User talk:WiiUser23

Deletion of Wiikey

A tag has been placed on WiiKey", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how WiiKey" is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:WiiKey" saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. --Allen3 ^talk 00:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the article WiiKey under Speedy deletion G4 because it appeared to be a direct extraction of material from the February 19 version of the article that was deleted via this AfD discussion. More specifically, the introductory paragraphs were very similar in wording, and the "Specifications" section of the March 13 version was dominated by a list containing only minor wording differences from the list in the "Features" section of the February 19 version. The only new content included in the march 13 version was an empty "References" section and an external link to a video game player wiki. --Allen3 ^talk 17:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The original justification for deleting it was lack of information. There was new information in my version, and thus G4 doesn't apply. I added new information about the chip, and was planning on adding more later when I had time. Besides, how much information is needed to keep an article? It looks like the only one or two people wanted the original Wiikey article pulled. Doesn't seem logical, if there are articles out there that have substantially less information in them. I say, re-create the article and give it sometime to develop before you cut it down. WiiUser23 (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What new content? As I mentioned earlier, the only "new content" was an empty reference section and and external link to a site that may or may not satisfy the guidelines for external links. If you truly want the article restored then you can start by finding citable reliable sources so any recreation can meet Wikipedia's verifiability requirements. --Allen3 ^talk 18:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All the information provided was from the manufacturer’s website. Also, once again I explained I added new information from their site. You don't delete an entire article because I forgot to include the link to the source. You tag it with the appropriate "cite sources" tag. Please restore, and I will add the tag to the information. WiiUser23 (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to take this to Wikipedia:Deletion review if you wish to overturn the results of the AfD. Until then, you have done nothing to address the issues raised at the AfD, nor the issues that would inevitably arise during a deletion review (primarily the existence of independent third party sources needed to provide verifiability). --Allen3 ^talk 20:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sun Lakes State Park.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Sun Lakes State Park.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Speedy deletion nomination of Wiip

Hello, WiiUser23,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Willbb234 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Wiip, for deletion, because it's impossible to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Wii-Boss" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wii-Boss. Since you had some involvement with the Wii-Boss redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 02:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"WiiJii PIC 12F629 Test Kit" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WiiJii PIC 12F629 Test Kit. Since you had some involvement with the WiiJii PIC 12F629 Test Kit redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 02:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"CycloWiz" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CycloWiz. Since you had some involvement with the CycloWiz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 02:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"YAOSM" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect YAOSM. Since you had some involvement with the YAOSM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Yowii" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yowii. Since you had some involvement with the Yowii redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"WiiFree" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WiiFree. Since you had some involvement with the WiiFree redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"InFeCtuS 2" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect InFeCtuS 2. Since you had some involvement with the InFeCtuS 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wasabi (Modchip)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wasabi (Modchip). Since you had some involvement with the Wasabi (Modchip) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"OpenWii" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect OpenWii. Since you had some involvement with the OpenWii redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"D2Pro" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect D2Pro. Since you had some involvement with the D2Pro redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"D2CKey" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect D2CKey. Since you had some involvement with the D2CKey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:24, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Argon Wii" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Argon Wii. Since you had some involvement with the Argon Wii redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"WiiKey" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WiiKey. Since you had some involvement with the WiiKey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"WiiD" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WiiD. Since you had some involvement with the WiiD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:27, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"WiiRez" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WiiRez. Since you had some involvement with the WiiRez redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesome Hwyh 14:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]