User talk:Whitecityplymouth

February 2019

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Plymouth, North Carolina, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Kirbanzo (talk) 02:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Whitecityplymouth. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Plymouth, North Carolina, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 03:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello. Your recent edit to Plymouth, North Carolina appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Julietdeltalima (talk) 03:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whitecityplymouth, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Whitecityplymouth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Plymouth, North Carolina. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Plymouth, North Carolina, you may be blocked from editing. Kirbanzo (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Plymouth, North Carolina. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:29, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Damien Linson

I noticed the problems you're having getting Damien Linson added as a notable person to Plymouth, North Carolina. Basically, to add a notable person to a list of notable people, there should be an article on that notable person to link to. There is no existing article for Damien Linson, and that's why other editors remove the name when you add it.

I'm not sure if the German Football League qualifies as a professional league under the notability requirements for football. You could ask that question on the talk page for sports notability. If it does, then you might consider creating an article for Damien Linson. After the article is accepted, you could then add him to the Plymouth article. (His time on the Ravens doesn't qualify him because, according to your sources, he didn't play a regular season game on that team.) I hope this helps. Schazjmd (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Correction - I learned from the discussion at the Teahouse on your changes that you can add him to Plymouth IF you can establish notability, even if there's no existing article for him. The key is still determining whether his play in the German Football League is sufficient for notability. Schazjmd (talk) 19:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Plymouth, North Carolina. This warning was issued as per close in WP:Teahouse#You guys are persistent. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 22:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Whitecityplymouth! You created a thread called You guys are persistent at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]