User talk:Whispering/Archive seven
Talk page archives 2005-06, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010-12, 2013-14
If you leave a message please sign with ~~~~ thank-you.
Speedy deletion contested: Talespinner Children's Theatre
[edit]Thank you for your interest in this page. I am contesting the speedy deletion of this page on the grounds that TCT is a three year-old, 501(c)(3) performing arts company in a large metropolitan area which has in its brief history generated significant, unique work. Since your original deletion post, I have contributed more to the page in an effort to bring it up to standards, and will receive and appreciate any further criticism. Horwendil (talk) 02:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Alexa Olvera
[edit]Hi, sorry for my bad english. It's a fake. It's delete in many wikipedia. All are make the even days. Sincerrely. I'm adminitrator in wikipedia France, not a vandal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enrevseluj (talk • contribs) 10:56, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Thomas William Dunn
[edit]Thomas William Dunn (talk) 09:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Ok delete as I cant add proof. Thanks
Edit request for cuny ba
[edit]You tagged, CUNY Baccalaureate for Unique and Interdisciplinary Studies as spam, however, it is not a spam page. If you can please make appropriate edits instead of deleting the page or marking it spam. Thanks 22:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC) ndij — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ndij (talk • contribs)
Transcutaneous electrode nerve stimulator page edit
[edit]Thank you whispering, I'm brand new to this and learning how. I saw just now that there's a tutorial about editing pages and adding information so I will take that on Monday when I'm done with my weekend fun :) Take it easy.
About Pursuit of Happiness
[edit]They are not the same movie. Pursuit of Happiness (2001 film) should be more like this, not the 2006 Will Smith movie. So the page needs to be rewritten or deleted (due to low notability).
- That I didn't know sorry about the warning then. You might want to drop a {{db}} template on it with a rational rather than just blanking the page. Whispering 13:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Dumf***istan, Real America, etc.
[edit]I couldn't find any of the deletion pages to which you refer. There's ample evidence for use of those terms. Just Google them and see all the images. Derntno (talk) 17:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Stockholm Academic Forum
[edit]Hello Whispering. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Stockholm Academic Forum, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Implied assertion of importance, education-related. Deserves a chance. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
- So, it does my mistake I go through so many new articles in a day I must of been on autopilot when I tagged that one. Whispering 20:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello Whispering, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Jas Binag, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article makes a claim as to the significance of the subject, so is ineligible for speedy deletion. Take this to AfD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 13:38, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
hi
[edit]can you help and do the page better. on sukhbaatar inscriptions! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.233.27.115 (talk) 16:31, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Santhosh Pandit
[edit]Hi Whispering.
Unfortunately I have reason to doubt that the edit by Supreethmark4 (talk · contribs) that you reverted here was a good faith edit as 2 other different new accounts added almost exactly the same BLP vio as their only edits in the 2½ hours after your revert. See Ninte achan (talk · contribs) and Ratheshkrishna (talk · contribs). Just FYI --220 of Borg 03:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: User:ISEAN-Hivos/sandbox
[edit]Hello Whispering. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:ISEAN-Hivos/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: decline speedy - meh, it's not that bad.. not overtly promotional, and it's in userspace, let's not bite the newbs.. the username does need to change however. Thank you. Ϫ 07:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Daniel Real Iain Christopher Postlethwaite
[edit]I noticed that a related page was deleted as made up, so perhaps I should have done that. What do you suggest I do? It seems pointless to recreate to delete under another tag, but I could restore and AfD if you think it's appropriate Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, I think that I know, but people don't always agree, so I'm always ready to listen to other views (: Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
US Federal Contractor Registration entry
[edit]I am asking you to please revoke your deletion for the Wikipedia entry US Federal Contractor Registration. It is a creditable business that has honestly helped over 60,000 businesses become registered to win government contracts and has helped American small businesses win billions in the federal marketplace. We had competitors file our last entry for deletion and it was a nightmare to try and resolve. Please help us out by revoking your statement.
Draft Master-at-Arms (United States Navy)
[edit]I am submitting this article as a draft. There is an article titles "Master-at-arms" and the section in it subtitled United States Navy is primarily what I have been editing. I am receiving many comments that the article is unbalanced, containing too much USA information. I want to create an article that is purely USA military information, similar to the Boatswain's mate (United States Navy). I need assistance prior to re-submitting:
Resubmission
[edit]- Do I delete what information I already have in the current article?
- How do I convey this to each reviewer if they are always different?
Taotaomona1977 (talk) 17:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
[edit]Hi, I'm MrX. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, List of Alpha Xi Delta chapters, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. - MrX 20:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:05, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:48, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
[edit]Hello Whispering. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi, i am the editor of the Wikipedia page of "DJKAM". I have all the legal rights from this artist to use the pict materials. Someone just removed all images from the article about a week ago!!?? Can someone please help me with this? The artist got very upset with this!!! Many thanks for support, P Pati Rojas (talk) 09:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
[edit]Hi Whispering,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Bunky
[edit]Stay off of my contributions!
My name is Bunky and I could add it on the page! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunky888 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
UAA report about Salman Shaikh (Actor)
[edit]Your UAA report about User:Salman Shaikh (Actor) has been declined. It is not a violation of the username policy to use a stage name as a user name, even when commercial performances under that name are discussed on the user page. See the username policy section on stage names. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:55, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia:PREVIEW
[edit]Hi, you placed {{db-spam|help=off}} on Wikipedia:PREVIEW. This was an improper G11 speedy request, since the page had been hijacked: before requesting speedy deletion, you should ensure that the speedy deletion criterion is valid. WP:PREVIEW is a shortcut redirect that has existed for over eleven years, and should not have been deleted (or repurposed) without a formal WP:RFD. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
3 Percenters Page
[edit]Hello Whispering. Can you tell me how you think the information I changed is incorrect? I'm the national leader of our movement and the owner of www.thethreepercenters.org. All of the information that I added was directly from our website on our About Us page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalebhill (talk • contribs) 04:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Simon Reich
[edit]What exactly is wrong with the edits made for Simon Reich's page? I spent a good hour updating his information, including updating his publication list because the old one was about ten years old, adding references for information requested by Wikipedia, and updating his biography which was last edited a year ago. There is no reason to reduce the information so that what's left is outdated. And for the record I didn't remove any sources, I only rearranged them with expanded content and added more sources. The list of past jobs was already there, I just modified the format. Waiting for two days to hear from you and if I don't I'll be reverting your changes and reporting you for senseless edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Globalhumanist (talk • contribs) 18:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Fine have at it. Although a lot of what you updated with looked like it came from a press release and need to be edited to be encyclopedic. Whispering 19:32, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Creating an entry
[edit]I am trying to understand how to get an entry and join the community. I am a fairly public figure. All my infirmation is confirmed if you google me from a variety of sources, websites. I tried to create a page which was deleted. Nanditaparshad (talk) 03:21, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, just a few things that you might want to consider. First off it's considered bad form to write articles in user space unless you are doing it in a Sandbox or Draft space. Also, writing about yourself is also considered a Conflict of Interest and generally discouraged. If you are a public figure I would suggest going to the Wikipedia Project page of your particular country/location and asking someone write an article about you. Whispering 21:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Greek government-debt crisis
[edit]- Any reason for undoing my edit? I did not see any type of explanation on your summary. If we have started to undo valid edits without explaining any reason, please let me know of this new policy. Ilirpedia (talk) 02:48, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- There is a edit summary, but I've added a edit summary for my last revert that might be more to your liking. Whispering 03:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
AfC
[edit]Hi Whispering,
Your account has been added to the list at AfC Participants allowing you to review drafts with the tools and mark them as accepted or rejected. Please be sure to read the Reviewing Instructions. Because the work is similar, you should also be familiar the tutorial for New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at Reviewer Help.
- Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible. The list of submissions waiting for review is at Submissions
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to review each draft, there is no rush.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove your name from the listat any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Numbered lists
[edit]Hi, re this q. Use one hash for each numbered entry
- First
- Second
- Third
use two hashes for sub-lists
- First
- First, subsection 1
- First, subsection 2
- Second
Use a hash and a colon or an asterisk to nest other types of list:
- First
- First, subsection
- First, subsection
- Second
or
- First
- First, subsection
- First, subsection
- Second
Important: the markup of the row above must be copied exactly, otherwise the numbering breaks
- First
- First, subsection
- First, subsection
- Second
and you get WP:LISTGAP issues. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
00:06:13, 10 September 2017 review of submission by BrendonTheWizard
[edit]
Hello! I am requesting that the drafted Hurricane Jose article be re-reviewed as there is a clear consensus on the Atlantic hurricane season, 2017 talk page that Jose should have a standalone article split off from the seasonal article of which Hurricane Jose (2017) currently redirects to. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 00:06, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm going to respectfully decline until the hurricane makes some sort of landfall. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball for all we know it could just suddenly start heading further into the Atlantic Ocean. Whispering 00:22, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry to say this as I mean it only in the most straightforward, literal, and unoffensive way but that decision was ill-informed because your criteria already happened. As can be found on nhc.noaa.gov, while Barbuda thankfully escaped the worst of the storm, it did receive tropical-storm-force winds, but as media reports have said there wasn't very much left to destroy. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 01:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Now that you've pretty much insulted my intelligence I'm not inclined to do anything. Whispering 02:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- It isn't an insult to intelligence by any means, it's only a clarification that the criteria you established has been met. I explicitly mentioned that I don't mean to insult you in any way and I still have no intention of insulting you, it was a continuation of why this request was made in the first place: by Wikipedia's precedents, this is warranted by all established guidelines and supported by members of the project. Even Russian, French, and Uzbek Wikipedia have this article; keeping it from publication on English Wikipedia is without justification. You said that you decline until it makes some sort of landfall in compliance with WP:CRYSTAL and that is exactly what happened. Please respond out of respect for Wikipedia policy and principle if not out of any obligation or inclination. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 03:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Again I'm going to respectfully decline. This whole thing has soured me to the point that I don't think I could be objective towards the article anymore. For further assistance please go to the AFC Help desk. Thank you. Whispering 19:09, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- It isn't an insult to intelligence by any means, it's only a clarification that the criteria you established has been met. I explicitly mentioned that I don't mean to insult you in any way and I still have no intention of insulting you, it was a continuation of why this request was made in the first place: by Wikipedia's precedents, this is warranted by all established guidelines and supported by members of the project. Even Russian, French, and Uzbek Wikipedia have this article; keeping it from publication on English Wikipedia is without justification. You said that you decline until it makes some sort of landfall in compliance with WP:CRYSTAL and that is exactly what happened. Please respond out of respect for Wikipedia policy and principle if not out of any obligation or inclination. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 03:29, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- Now that you've pretty much insulted my intelligence I'm not inclined to do anything. Whispering 02:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm very sorry to say this as I mean it only in the most straightforward, literal, and unoffensive way but that decision was ill-informed because your criteria already happened. As can be found on nhc.noaa.gov, while Barbuda thankfully escaped the worst of the storm, it did receive tropical-storm-force winds, but as media reports have said there wasn't very much left to destroy. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 01:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Joel Adams (Singer)
[edit]The edits made to his page were not vandalism but fact — Preceding unsigned comment added by GD unit (talk • contribs) 04:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe so maybe not, still needs reliable sources to verify. Whispering 04:14, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]_by_Ron.jpg)
A kitten in return! Thanks for sticking with me and sorting thru the GFOO that AfC can sometimes be.
Sulfurboy (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Brick & Portal Constructive Feedback
[edit]Hi Whispering!
I recently made the Brick & Portal page that I'm currently re-editing and I was wondering what exactly I would need to do to really make this page stand up. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia and copyediting articles but it's something that I've found a lot of enjoyment out of and I'd like to get better.
In your feedback it said to leave more relevant articles. Is there a certain way that I'm citing them that makes them non-viable?
Thanks for any feedback! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiphoptissuebox (talk • contribs) 15:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Just read the page about reliable sources it's more thorough than I can be. Whispering 19:15, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I had written a draft of an article on Window Nation and it was flagged for copyright infringement for too closely paraphrasing a cited source article: http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bs-bz-interview-harley-aaron-magden-20110904-story.html
I have read the article on close paraphrasing at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing and I believe I have revised the content substantially enough to resubmit the article for review. Before I do so, I was hoping you would be willing to take a look at my revision and confirm that I have revised the piece to avoid copyright infringement.
My revision: Co-Founders of Window Nation, Harley and Aaron Magden, have worked in the window industry since they were young. Their father owned Regency Window Co. in Cleveland, Ohio, and the brothers decided to start their own company when their father sold Regency. Since the brothers had a non-compete agreement with their father’s former business, they moved to the Baltimore area to open Window Nation.
Many thanks,
Aswopewmx (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Aswopewmx (talk) 18:40, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- I just tag it like I see it, it's up to the admin viewing the tag to make the decision in this instance RHaworth any further inquires should be put on their page. Whispering 19:10, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
- Perfect, thanks for the clarification and direction. Cheers.Aswopewmx (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi,
you recently reviewed my draft article and deleted it due to copyright infringement. However I believe that I had correctly attributed all sources as per wiki guidelines. I'd like to review the offending section but can't seem to retrieve the draft article - can you help?
Thanks in advance for your assistance
Neverland1972 (talk) 10:38, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- I cannot due to it being deleted but if you contact the deleting admin RHaworth they will be able to help. Whispering 19:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
11:48:14, 17 September 2017 review of submission by PaoloAR15
[edit]
Nevermind. You showed my point: wikipedia is useless and an information manipulator.
I wonder why a very UNIMPORTANT people like Pietro Taricone worth a mention in wikipedia and a yound italian girl 13 yrs old killed by partisans for revenge does not. I am NOT going to use wikipedia (never than ever giving money to it) and as a writer and journalist I am going to reccomend NOT to fund and use it.
Have a good day.
- Not really we just have standards, and unfortunately your article didn't meet them. The reason why was left on the article. Whispering 19:14, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
NFL owner personal net worth
[edit]So you cited wikipedia not being a place for indiscriminate information as the reason for rejecting my page. I'm not sure how it is just a bunch of indiscriminate information. It's not like its just a bunch of random information thrown together to create a page. It is information on only one area, net worth. If this page is not accepted because of the reasons you cited, why exactly is there a page solely dedicated to listing the net worth of every US president. It is literally the same exact thing, same subject, same information. What exactly is the difference between that article and mine?Zdawg1029 (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- To be honest if that article was in AfC I would of denied it as well. However, you can always list it again for someone else to take a look at it. I promise I won't review it again. Whispering 21:00, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
- Dopenguins (talk · contribs)
Hello. I have submitted the article again. It is my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dopenguins (talk • contribs) 08:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
I had to change the title as I could not find a way to resubmit it for review. I contacted help but did not get a reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dopenguins (talk • contribs) 09:46, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your message.
I actually am responsible for the text on imdb, - as I am a contributor on that site. I created the entire page and credits on imdb for this person. The text therefore is eligible for use on your site as well, there is no copyright.
Dopenguins (talk) 05:57, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- The problem with submitting something to IMDB is as soon as you submit the page it becomes property of IMDB and thus falls under their copyright. To claim copyright for yourself you would have to host it yourself claim that it's not under copyright and fill out the appropriate forms provided by Wikipedia. However if you did that it would fall under the onus of original research and still be rejected. So, your best bet to get your article accepted is to find reliable sources to cite. Whispering 01:35, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
ReTest
[edit]Hello,
recently I wrote a wikipedia page about ReTest which you then declined in draft. I would appreciate it if you could state why exactly the article was declined since I want to improve the article and publish it.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphakong (talk • contribs) 07:39, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
- Well the links in the pink box in the article explain it pretty well. I suggest reading those first. Whispering 01:37, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
07:42:19, 18 September 2017 review of submission by Арт крихітка
[edit]- Арт крихітка (talk · contribs)
Hello! Can You help me with my article? what I need to change my page be submitted? This page exist in Ukrainian language and it is a translation on English. What is wrong?
- We need reliable sources Facebook and YouTube are not reliable sources. Also sources do need to be independent from the subject of the article. Whispering 01:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Therapeutic storytelling
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing—Therapeutic storytelling—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 08:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
12:32:16, 19 September 2017 review of submission by Bu11man7
[edit]
Regarding decline of Epi proColon - Methylated Septin 9 Wikipedia page.
Please provide specific reasons for the decline. There are at least 3 other similar diagnostic tests that have an entry. Using the basis of these, the Epi proColon page was created. All of these are one-of-a-kind diagnostic tests that are commercially available. Please refer below:
Allomap - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlloMap_molecular_expression_testing Oncotype Dx - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oncotype_DX Cologuard - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multitarget_stool_DNA_screening_test
The article is well research, cited, and backed by science. The importance to the Wiki community is the knowledge that this science is commercially available and backed by peer-reviewed published articles that have gone through an FDA-approved submission.
Upon internal review - the Epi proColon page provides no more 'advertisement' that the 3 referenced (above) pages. The inclusion of these 3 pages establishes precedent that these type of one-of-a-kind diagnostic tests pages are acceptable within the Wikipedia community.
If there is a specific section or statement is considered advertisement, please indicate those..
Reconsider your 'Decline'.
- Quite possibly but those weren't up for AfC. And they don't have ® scattered all over the page. So, no I won't reconsider it for a decline at this time until it gets a good copy edit. Whispering 20:49, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
02:09:43, 20 September 2017 review of submission by JesusMeat
[edit]
I have resubmitted with corrections and more sources. The artist is one of the most popular musicians on the noise music scene.
Article on Data extraction tool I use-Deletion
[edit]Hello,
I recently wrote a generic article about a data extraction tool I use called Mozenda. I believe it was marked to be deleted for not having good references. I am not aware of any references other than blogs and reviews on the tool itself. There are also a lot of vidoes on youtube of people doing demos on the product. Would none of those work as references? I looked over other software companies pages and it seems that their references are all review articles as well. Thank you for your help!
Page declined
[edit]Hello--Hoping for clarification on sources to have my page approved. I linked to parent organization, its true, but also to reputed medical journals and non-related organizations.
Also in relation to my references, shall I add more in the "References" section or in the text (hyperlinked) itself?
Am I correct in concluding that what's really wanted are news sources? Thank you
Rejected article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Christiana_Olabisi_Ebun_Haastrup_23_June_1926_to_11_February_2013
[edit]I thought I had amended the article by correcting the referencing. The book that is referenced can be found in the British Library:
'DesoHaa (talk) 20:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- The problem is that source is behind a registered users only wall. So, we need some sources that we can verify without having to register for. Whispering 20:36, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Sorry, don't understand. Is the registered user you are referring to 'DesoHaa? If so, what is my wall?'DesoHaa (talk) 22:36, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
- The source you linked to is behind a registered users only link, and thus not verifiable. We need multiple verifiable reliable sources. Whispering 22:50, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Request on 04:23:30, 26 September 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by 2601:741:8080:2D0:9D16:E901:9981:49A4
[edit]
Incorrect reason for declining the article submission Hi, the reason for declining the submission was given as follows "Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Heyward-Washington House instead." That is incorrect! These are two separate houses. The Heyward-Washington House is located at 87 Church St. in Charleston and The Thomas Heyward Jr. House is located at 18 Meeting St. in Charleston. Thomas Heyward Jr., a SC signer of The Declaration of Independence, moved to the 18 Meeting St. house after living at the 87 Church St. house earlier in his life. The Thomas Heyward Jr. House at 18 Meeting St. is one of the most recognizable and prominent historical homes in Charleston and is distinct and separate from the Heyward- Washington House. Thanks!
2601:741:8080:2D0:9D16:E901:9981:49A4 (talk) 04:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Whoops thanks for letting me know I've reverted my changes. Whispering 04:26, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Tomfromtulsa (talk · contribs)
Thank you for your review. I've continued to edit this article to read more like an Encyclopedia, but apparently I continue to fail. I suspect it's not all bad, so can you give me some specific sections to work on or more precise feedback? If it is really bad and I've missed the mark completely, let me know, so I can stop trying - I won't be offended.
Thanks, Tomfromtulsa (talk) 15:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC) Tomfromtulsa (talk) 15:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- I would start with words to watch it gives a good general overview of words to not include when writing a article. Whispering 00:54, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi Wispering, you declined my article about Dr. Todor Mitrović because of 'lack of notability'. Dr. Mitrović is one of the few outstanding practical and theoretical (scientific) experts in modern Orthodox iconography. Should you think he's only of local prominence, consider that he's member of international councils, at least one of his books is translated into two languages other than Serbian; and please read the interview in the Orthodox Arts Journal. Exhibtions in Bulgaria, Romania, Great Britain, France, Greece, Germany ain't that bad, I think.
There is a saying 'You have to play your own trumpet' but I think not only those making a noise are notable.
But of course I am open to learn about notability.
DeeJoe (talk) 00:46, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- That he might be the problem is we don't have any reliable sources to back up the claims that he is who you say he is. Your sources in the article as they are right now consist of a Wordpress site a primary source, a listing, a listing, and another primary source. Like the box a the top of the draft states "Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Ergo, he might be notable but we have no way of knowing that at this point. Whispering 00:59, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- 17bostongirl (talk · contribs)
I didn't need this to be reviewed (and then declined). I am in a WikiLib class and have no idea what I am doing...--17bostongirl (talk) 03:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
17bostongirl (talk) 03:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- May I suggest the help desk then? Whispering 03:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
rejection of womens single sculls article
[edit]The "existing page" only refers the user back to the summary rowing page. The page I submitted is a full detail of the women's single sculls. Please check the "existing page" at this link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowing_at_the_1996_Summer_Olympics When you click on women's single sculls it refers you right back to the over view page.
07:16:47, 2 October 2017 review of submission by 195.178.246.9
[edit]
Dear Whispering, Thank you very much for your note. The text was completely written by me, but I am also the author for the unu.flores page of his CV. the Conversation.com just used our file to publish. I sincerely appreciate if you can shed some guidelines on how I should entirely rewrite it using my personal tone.
Thank you.
Bio of Raymnd Tranchant
[edit]Ben,
The information I have provided is first hand (my own biography). References are hard to come by.
Could you posssibly look at it and give me some feedback.
I would be graciously appreciative for taking your valuable time! You have an awsome job.
Regards,
Ray Tranchant user name: rtranchant
(Rtranchant (talk) 03:27, 3 October 2017 (UTC))
- It's about you wherein lies the problem. Writing about ones self is strongly discouraged here at Wikipedia. If you want to read more on the topic of writing about ones self check out the autobiography page. Whispering 03:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- WolfgangSchi (talk · contribs)
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:XML_Summer_School
In my WolfgangSchi/Sandbox I wrote an article on "XML Summer School" which I did submit for review last week. It was rejected on the basis of a copyright violation which in my opinion is defitely not true.
The web site of this XML conference has an "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)" licence as you may see here: http://xmlsummerschool.com/about-this-site/. Writing about such a conference implies that I had to use explicit quotes from the web site or articles on the event which are marked and each has an explicit reference. I did my utmost to preserve an objective style of writing with no personal overtones or evaluation. For each statement, I have explicitly given the references where I took that information from. I think, you can't avoid when you are describing such a topic that your statements have some linguistic relationship to your sources - this doesn't imply a simple copy and paste or a paraphrase, but the use of certain words or a strain of thought.
Could you perhaps assist me to overcome any issue so that this article will be published and the time I invested to write it would not be in vain?
Many thanks in advance! WolfgangSchi (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
WolfgangSchi (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Dear Whispering, Thank you. Would you please kindly review the draft page for Reza Ardakanian? I have modified the referencing. Thank you.
Benjiwiki2017 (talk) 20:07, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
18:05:40, 5 October 2017 review of submission by Tencl.jakub
[edit]- Tencl.jakub (talk · contribs)
Hello, I have corrected the issue on my page Tenčl, Jakub and then I have developed the text, I think now the page is ready for re-review, I would be happy if you review the page again. Thank you!
19:26:58, 5 October 2017 review of submission by DVespremi
[edit]
Please review the updated draft - thanks
15:40:00, 10 October 2017 review of submission by Jeremydandrus17
[edit]
Hello,
I just want further clarification as to why my submission was denied. I have provided independent, reliable and published sources to show that this company has created research that publications have used for independent articles. Is it the way that I cited my sources that is a problem? If so, then I can simply change that . If that is not the reason why, then you can you show me specific areas that need improvement?
Jeremydandrus17 (talk) 15:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Notability of Lil Pump Draft
[edit]Artist Lil Pump recently released an album so I felt like creating a page for him because his single Gucci Gang had entered the mainstream (46# on the Billboard 100.) I found a draft that had been rejected recently by you, can I ask why before I begin editing this page to a more acceptable standard. Gucci Gang peaked at #46 on the Billboard 100 and if I can recall correctly, WP:MUS criteria says "Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria." and #2 is "has had a single or album on any country's national music chart" (which Lil Pump has had) I'm really just asking why you rejected the article before I start making edits to it, thank you! WolvesS (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Use duplicate only if both in submitted state
[edit]Thanks for your work on the backlog at AfC. I'm reverting your decline of User:Ayirp Sharma/sandbox because, although there is another draft on the topic (Draft:Rajendra Kumar Sharma), it wasn't waiting to be reviewed at the time, so being a duplicate isn't a good reason to decline. The editor apparently abandoned the first draft and started over in their sandbox, which is permissable as long as doing so doesn't break any attribution of authorship. I'll bash it into better shape, but it will likely still be declined, as it needs a lot of work. This way the author will get some feedback regarding what needs improvement, though, rather than just being sent to the back of the line. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi there. I see that Lil Pump has quite the history of non-notability. That being said, he is Billboard's #1 emerging artist this week, which may tip the scale, per WP:MUSICBIO. This 17 year-old is certainly able to put together some uplifting lyrics, and will likely become another great role model for our youth. I'm not sure how a draft article works. Do I add to it and resubmit? Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Note to Magnolia677 from a talk-page stalker: If one drills through WP:MUSICBIO to WP:USCHARTS (the list of US charts that have any credibility, notability-wise) Emerging Artists doesn't make the cut. --Worldbruce (talk) 04:47, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
18:27:03, 13 October 2017 review of submission by Kindness33
[edit]- Kindness33 (talk · contribs)
Hello,
I fixed everything on the page "Ursula Hayden" and was wondering if you could take a look at it? I resubmitted it for review and am just waiting for approval now. Thank you in advance!
response to Whispering on Evolution of Art
[edit]Hello, Whispering, I am new to The WIki site and maybe you could let me know how to do a few things. Thank you for the review and response to my new Article. I added a couple of references and looked at it a bit more. I am not trying to sell a product or service just trying to inform readers of the mediums that can be used and how they have changed throughout time into this new digital age. TheKBF2017 (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC) TheKBF2017 TheKBF2017 (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2017 (UTC) Kimberly B. Fitzgerald
balaipluton (wii with limited alternate display modes)
[edit]Hello Whispering, I'm balaipluton. I'm a new user on wikipedia. If I write this message for you it's because I took 2 hours for write this subject and I think it's shame that this was not accept. If I don't write references it's because I already see the alternate display modes on the back of PAL box games in supermarket. So if you don't agree for this publishing I can understand but if you know people who are interested to that and cognize the subject well it's can be good than they continue to write my article in my stead if it's possible. Thank you.
- Well, thank you for the time you put into the article. However, Sources or references for statements made in articles are one of the main tenets here on Wikipedia. What you have done is original research which is something we don't allow here on Wikipedia. Whispering 23:00, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi - i resubmitted my last article as a stub whereas it was first submitted I did it as a full article. Do I still need to expand to get approval as a stub? Worried about it crossing the border into encyclopedic entry.
OllyRoche (talk) 04:04, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
04:20:08, 18 October 2017 review of submission by Kindness33
[edit]- Kindness33 (talk · contribs)
Hello,
I resubmitted the page "Ursula Hayden" for review and was wondering if you could check it out? Thank you so much!
Wiki entry
[edit]Hello. I am not sure why you declined our entry for Table Rock Tea Company. Please refer to the entry for "Charleston Tea Plantation." You will see a very similar page, and that was approved.
US Grown Tea is a very significant subject, and Table Rock Tea Company plays a significant role in that space. We have kept this article neutral, we are cited in numerous publications and media outlets as historically significant.
If you are going to claim that this "reads like an advertisement", then you at least need to offer a suggestion as to which part, SPECIFICALLY, needs to change. Again, I would encourage you to read the Wikipedia entry for Charleston Tea Plantation and see that they are very much in line.
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelorches (talk • contribs) 05:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I have edited and resubmitted my article on Table Rock Tea Company. Again, you have rejected it. If you truly are a credible editor, you will BE SPECIFIC as to which sentences violate your assessment criteria. This article is factual, neutral, and relevant. I await your SPECIFIC suggestions to approve it for publication. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelorches (talk • contribs) 16:06, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
16:38:49, 19 October 2017 review of submission by Igor-23
[edit]
This submission Draft:Seekon Directory was rejected by Whispering as promotional: “reads like advertisement.” It was then (current draft) substantially rewritten to remove any wording that might be considered promotional, better conform to the other pages in Category: Web directories and resubmitted as a draft. There was no subsequent objection for two weeks so it was moved to Seekon Directory as per the move instructions but has now been moved back to the Draft space and new additional objections raised. Help is requested in understanding the current objections. Sorry if this is not the proper procedure for a resubmission.
Objectors are requested to please explain how the subject page now “reads more like an advertisement” than the other existing pages in this category. I agree with the idea that Wikipedia should not contain promotional material. However, obviously, it must contain descriptive material that describes the differences between different items in a category. Specific information on this would be very helpful in fixing the submission.
I am not being paid for working on this item or any of my other Wikipedia activities.
This submission otherwise appears to conform closely to other previously accepted pages in the Category:Web directories, which contains 36 other pages describing other web directories. Objectors are requested to explain how this page is less acceptable than many of the existing Wikipedia pages in this category. In particular, look at the following:
- Findlay
- TAXI (website)
- Hotfrog
- Alleba
- Humbul
- Programmable Web
- Sources (website)
- Virtual Library museums pages
- Zeal (web)
Some of these pages are flagged for supposedly not meeting some Wikipedia requirement but are still accepted and displayed. Some are flagged for “multiple issues” but are still accepted and displayed. Any aid in understanding why each of these pages has been accepted but the subject page has been removed would be greatly appreciated and aid in correcting the subject page and avoiding such difficulties in the future.
Review on "Sir Alex Adams"
[edit]Good morning... Please I couldn't find your last review on my article "Sir Alex Adams". The article is an autobiography... How do i go about it. You can send a mail through officialalexadams@yahoo.com Thank you. Do have a great day ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir Alexx (talk • contribs) 06:41, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
- That is the problem, the page is a autobiography which are strongly discouraged here at Wikipedia. Generally if you are notable enough someone will come along and write a article about you. Whispering 00:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
18:20:22, 22 October 2017 review of submission by DEHenry33
[edit]
I am David Eugene Henry, the artist who wrote the article for the my Wikipedia submission. It was declined due to lack of citation of sources. The information in the article can be substantiated but I don't know how you want me to do it. The section about which you requested citation of sources was the list of group exhibitions in which my artwork was included. I have exhibition catalogs on some of the exhibitions, letters of acceptance on some exhibitions and awards certificates from some exhibitions. Much of the information in my article is also included in Who's Who in American Art and in Bob Creps book on American artists. William Eiland, the director of the Georgia Museum of Art, is very familiar with my work and biography and I am certain he would be willing to vouch for the information. There are also 2 examples of my works in the permanent art collection of the State of Georgia which can be seen on the Ga Council for the Arts website page: http://gaarts.org/component/search/?searchword=david%20henry&searchphrase=all&Itemid=163 if you would like to see them. How would you like me to site my sources? I stand behind everything in the article because I know the information to be factual through first-hand knowledge. Is it possible for me to just cite "Who's Who in American Art", Bob Creps book "Biographical Encyclopedia of American Painters, Sculptors & Engravers of the U. S." published in 2002, and "David Henry Paintings, Drawings, Bronzes" written and compiled by myself and Romita Ray, curator of prints and drawings at the Georgia Museum of Art, published in 2011 (currently for sale on ebay). The book by Romita Ray and myself book contains all of the information used in the article I just submitted to Wikipedia. Perhaps there is some way to just cite these 3 books as sources for the information. PLEASE, please help me with this. I am 70 years old and have limited experience with computers and the internet. It is very important to me to preserve this information about my art and career for future generations of art collectors who want to know about me as an artist. I think putting this information on the Wikipedia site will be very useful for those trying to find out about the artist whose work they have in their collections.
- I would refer you to what I wrote to Sir Alex above. Autobiographies are strongly discouraged on Wikipedia, if you are notable enough someone will most likely come along and write a article about you. Whispering 18:59, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
00:55:24, 24 October 2017 review of submission by Jmb900b
[edit]
Hello! May I ask what part of the article expresses bias? Jmb900b (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- Right, I reverted and added a better reason. Whispering 01:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
10:47:57, 24 October 2017 review of submission by 2602:306:374B:EFF0:9D96:44FE:2A79:5329
[edit]
Thank you for your time and review specifics.
I was trying to write our Wiki listing in a similar style to this one - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quad/Graphics
I will follow your instructions and circle back.
Any additional instructions are greatly appreciated.
I understand the initial decision and have checked the link. 00n3 model railways have their own page, as does G scale. I cannot understand why TTn3 is denied equal status. There is more detail in the submission I have made and it would be out of format to have a section on TTn3 beneath the table of scales and gauges - there is nothing else in this fashion there.
Spt001
Spt001 (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Spt001 (talk) 14:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
14:51:40, 26 October 2017 review of submission by Karlsvensson1976
[edit]
20:44:58, 26 October 2017 review of submission by RLYoder
[edit]
This is my first contribution to WP and I'm unclear where in-line citations are needed. There are no direct quotes and I did not think any of the text was controversial or might be challenged. I'm guessing that her book South America Mi Hija was nominated for a National Book Award might need a citation as well as the other awards. Is that correct and if so, is a referencing link to the University of Pittsburgh web site (the publisher of the book) that states the book was nominated for a National Book Award sufficient?
Thank you
RLYoder
Retaining Drafts
[edit]Hey there, Thanks for the note. I was hoping to edit the page for my client, but it was deleted altogether, which means I have to start all over. I don't have a saved version of what I ended up with in my Wikipedia draft.
Why aren't new articles saved as drafts so they can be revised? Why are they deleted entirely?
Thanks. Jenniferloring (talk) 03:18, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Jenniferloring, based on what I've seen of your contributions, your draft was deleted because it was directly copied from another website. Normally, unacceptable drafts are simply declined, with a note to the submitter on how to further improve the page. However, copyright violations are immediately deleted. You are welcome to recreate the draft, but please make sure everything is written in your own words. Primefac (talk) 12:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Review of draft Reza Ardakanian
[edit]Dear Whispering,
I hope you are keeping well. I have followed your advice to modify the text and would it be possible if you could kindly have a look and provide me with your feedback?
Thank you very much.
Review of draft Gotham (season 2)
[edit]Hello, I would like to ask why you declined my article creation request for Draft:Gotham (season 2). Your response was: "Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at List of Gotham episodes instead." However, my goal was actually to split that section of the article into Gotham (season 2), as List of Gotham episodes is at almost 115,000 bytes in length. So I would like to try to get that split if possible, but please feel free to reply so we can discuss. Thank you. JE98 (talk) 02:10, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
@Whispering, good day. Thank you for the reply re: my recent Article for Creation submission. Apparently, I have submitted that draft page to the incorrect clearinghouse for posting here at wikipedia.org. My intent was merely to create a user page for my still relatively new account profile here at wikipedia. Obviously, I have misread or misinterpreted the directions for submitting such a page. My error in forwarding that user page draft to the editorial portal for your review. Cheers, Nayokali Lakimibasas (talk) 15:29, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
19:41:04, 31 October 2017 review of submission by Bob Sutcliffe
[edit]
The existing article 'Bunding' made no reference to integrity assessments of bunds. This I feel is an important topic. I appreciate that some of the material is duplicated but only so far as to make it clear what a bund is.
If i amended the article to remove duplicated material and cross referenced the 'bunding' article would that work for you. A link from the 'bunding' article to my article on integrity assessment would help complete the 'bunding' article.
- Well see that's the great thing about Wikipedia, you can just add your text to the existing article. Although, you might want to do a mock up in your sandbox and drop a note about the changes on the articles talk page about the change before doing so though. Whispering 00:55, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
cameron moulene
[edit]hi there(: @Whispering: sorry to bother, you left a message on my draft page on the actor Cameron Moulene a while ago. I read through your comments and I think I have fixed the mistakes, would it be possible for you to read through and check if the mistakes are fixed? I have resubmitted it and understand that it will take a while before reviewed, but just wanted to check if there was anything more I could do. thank you(: Gabi.labuschagne (talk) 12:16, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Review of PAN AFRICAN UNIVERSITIES DEBATING CHAMPIONSHIP Article
[edit]Hi,
I write in respect to the above named article. upon discovering the premiere debating championship in Africa is not on Wikipedia, i sought to create a page for it, but then realised a draft for it had already been (poorly) made and rightfully declined. So, I made a lot of improvements to the article and added pertinent references for it as well.
I have resubmitted it for review and would like to know if you'd be reviewing it again. If yes, it would be great if the process is expedited if possible.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inung Ejim (talk • contribs) 19:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
I declined your request for the speedy deletion of User talk:SallyShehab because the majority of content on the page consists of messages to the user, not the user's own writings. In fact, those messages were written by you, and if the page were speedily deleted, the user would not receive those messages. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:26, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- The machine translator strikes again. Thanks. Whispering 03:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Advice
[edit]Hello there,
Could you please advice me on why my article is being refused?
Thank you
Angeline — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.angeline55 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
- To be honest, the text and links in the pink box will help you a lot more than I can. Just follow the links. Whispering 21:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
You declined my submission because of lack of sources
[edit]HI Whispering,
Can you please let me know why you suggested my sources were not reliable? Billboard magazine is not a reliable source for an album that has achieved Notable status? I also used several other reliable resources. Can you suggest specifically what part of the article needs more sources? That would be helpful to me. Best regardsCheryl Fullerton (talk) 20:32, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Cheryl
Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I thought the sources I cited are reliable, Billboard magazine, AllMusic and others. Can you tell me why specifically these sources were rejected? Craig Chaquico is a well-known guitarist, composer, and producer with Grammy Awards, and nominations for over 20 plus years, having played with Jefferson Airplane, Jefferson Starship and Starship and then launching his own successful, award-winning albums career. Please let me know how to go about this article. I would really appreciate some suggestions. Cheryl Fullerton (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Cheryl
Hi Whispering! Thank you for your review. The note says that the article reads more like an advertisement but it's not clear to me which part is lacking. We've tried to the best of our newbie capabilites ot keep a very neutral and informational tone. Would you mind pointing us to the elements or phrasing that is inappropriate and we will rework it in line with your guidance. At present we have no ideas what to change despite us reading all guidelines to the best of our understanding. Thank you very much for your help and support. Kind regards, Aegir
Aegir.heyerdhal (talk) 22:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
23:23:53, 12 November 2017 review of submission by Samahita
[edit]
Is it the material in section REFERENCES and WORKS that should be Moved or just Cited in a new section Footnotes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samahita (talk • contribs) 23:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
05:16:53, 13 November 2017 review of submission by AKIYAMA.AYA
[edit]- AKIYAMA.AYA (talk · contribs)
hello,
Regarding my article, it's my first time to submit an article to Wikipedia
So, firs, I wish to thank you for the feedback
Regarding your feedback, I only added the definition in the beginning as a type of introduction. However, it's not the main purpose of the article, and it didn't exceed one sentence. I already explained about reasons why Japanese people resort for online shopping, famous online shopping websites used in Japan, and companies use online shopping.
So I wonder if you have any suggestion for starting my article instead
Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by AKIYAMA.AYA (talk • contribs) 05:16, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
07:05:42, 15 November 2017 review of submission by 103.233.141.63
[edit]- dead.man8171 (talk · contribs)
Please tell me why my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sonu_Ke_Titu_Ki_Sweety getting declined again and again, I dont think that it contains any invalid contents in it, Please provide me details on this so that I can publish this easily!!!
Let me clarify one thing all the actors and actresses are verified in this Page hence there is not any actor that does not have his/her Wikipedia page, please let me know that If I need to add anymore verification on this page to make it more useful! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dead.man8171 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello !
[edit]It's the second time that Wikipedia doesn't give me confirmation, refuse to confirm my page. Can I learn the reason? Or what I must correct? This Wikipedia page is the page of famous singer who has clips on YouTube, news and photos on google. Please look through and help in confirmation. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elnur Məmmədov (talk • contribs) 09:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- The main problem I'm seeing with your article is that it's a autobiography which here on Wikipedia are strongly discouraged. Whispering 01:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Elnur Məmmədov, I've just declined your draft (again). I've given some pointers and advice for how to improve the page to the point where it might become an acceptable page. As a note, please do not remove old decline notices or comments, as these are important for reviewers to see how the draft has progressed and if any major concerns have been met. Primefac (talk) 01:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
20:46:36, 19 November 2017 review of submission by Windscorpion
[edit]- Windscorpion (talk · contribs)
Hi Whispering, thank you. I was aware of this other Napoleon Oak page, however the one in this submitted article is actually another tree in Switzerland by the same name. Not sure how to get around this. I think it is notable both due to the history and extensive genetic work done on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Windscorpion (talk • contribs) 20:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Curse people for naming things after other things. That is a good question and not one that I'm sure I can answer if I was you I would go drop a message off at the AfC Help desk and see what they think. Whispering 22:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'd say just un-review the page (i.e. null the decline) and re-review. Primefac (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
04:10:14, 20 November 2017 review of submission by Prasac wiki
[edit]- Prasac wiki (talk · contribs)
I would like to inform you that Some content we copy from our own website only, please note that.
our own website is www.prasac.com.kh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prasac wiki (talk • contribs) 04:10, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Prasac wiki, you cannot copy from your own website, because your own website is under copyright. In order to release text from your website for use on Wikipedia, it must be released under an acceptable license. I highly suggest (after you get unblocked) that you simply write a new draft in your own words, but otherwise see WP:DONATETEXT for information about a compatible site license. Primefac (talk) 12:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Thalna
[edit]Hi, @Whispering: I was helping Cetagirl today in her sandbox for the draft on Thalna. I usually edit on WP:PT, so I I wasn't sure about the review button, since we don't use that system there. To tell you the truth, I thought they were all working on new pages, so I'll have to check the other sandboxes to avoid this happening again. Reading the current page and the draft, I saw that the current information is also there in the new page, but there are more references and the text is more developed. Do you think we could merge these two pages? I usually ask my admin friends on WP:PT for this sort of more technical task, but I can see some procedures are a little different here. Thank you very much, Domusaurea (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- The good thing about Wikipedia you can just go and edit the other article and add the information from the draft. Better sourced and larger articles with more information are always a plus. Whispering 04:19, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewing
[edit] |
| Hello, Whispering.
I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. |
21:48:41, 21 November 2017 review of submission by User:Chockguzell
[edit]- Chockguzell (talk · contribs)
Hello, I submitted an article on Artemidorus of Knidos. This was declined because an article on Artemidorus already exists.
But the Artemidorus I have written about is not the same as the other 3 of that name who have entries.
From my reading of the instructions I thought that I should not attempt to disambiguate my guy from the others and that this would be taken care of by the system. Have you any advice on how I should proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chockguzell (talk • contribs) 21:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
- Chockguzell, it looks like your draft has been accepted. Primefac (talk) 17:39, 22 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
New Page Reviewer granted
[edit]Hello Whispering. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
- URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — xaosflux Talk 00:18, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Please remember to check for copyvio
[edit]Hi Whispering, and thanks for your work reviewing new articles. Please remember to check for copyright violations. The particular one I saw was Brian L. Johnson, which had extensive copying from https://www.tuskegee.edu/discover-tu/tu-presidents/brian-johnson and http://www.apsu.edu/archived-news/2014/04/apsus-dr-brian-johnson-named-president-tuskegee-university.php. Thank you, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- Usually I catch those but I was feeling under the weather yesterday so I'll blame that. Cheers! Whispering 20:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Please review on my article.--85.140.4.55 (talk) 06:57, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
13:29:52, 28 November 2017 review of submission by SPEDteacher
[edit]- SPEDteacher (talk · contribs)
This is my first attempt at a wikipedia entry so I'm confused as to which of the references are questionable in this submission. Can you help me out with this? I am a special education teacher who has experienced Mr. Spencer's work with my students. His prominence in the magic community is well documented with a simple google search. His professorship at Carlow University and the work of his non-profit are also well documented. What particular statements were made that require more in-depth references? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SPEDteacher (talk • contribs) 13:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Lightricks / Moseron/sandbox - AfC you reviewed was main-spaced
[edit]See Lightricks (as well as Enlight Photofox and Enlight Videoleap) - I PRODed all three, however notifying due to your AfC review at User:Moseron/sandbox.Icewhiz (talk) 14:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
20:10:39, 30 November 2017 review of submission by Flsauda
[edit]
After the draft was first declined several improvements have been made to the draft with the inclusion of most of (if not all) the necessary references proving the authenticity of the information provided. I'd like to know if there's anything more to be done to improve the article so that it is reviewed again and approved, since it was declined in under a day and has been awaiting re-review for over a month now. Thank you.
You rejected my submission by saying that the page already existed. The problem was that the article already made was about a different person with the same name, so I would appreciate if you would reread the article.
Will37 (talk) 02:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
- No problem, I just rolled back my edit. So someone else can review it. Whispering 20:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
00:06:05, 3 December 2017 review of submission by CJ Machado
[edit]- CJ Machado (talk · contribs)
What are the requirements for an infobox? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CJ Machado (talk • contribs) 00:06, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Not sure about the requirements but I do know there is a list Wikipedia:List of infoboxes of various infoboxes that people can use on articles. Whispering 03:19, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Whispering. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
16:42:22, 5 December 2017 review of submission by SVondra32
[edit]
I would like to post this as a new article for 2017 NBA Offseason not adding on to the already existing 2017 NBA Draft page. What would be the best way for me to go about doing this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SVondra32 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
10:21:58, 6 December 2017 review of submission by Br Miller
[edit]
Other Wikipedia articles on animated web series such as the Raised By Zombies Wikipedia article only provided the web series' episodes on YouTube as source yet the sources were considered significant enough. Why is not the same case here? Battle for Dream Island is an extremely popular show on YouTube with the first episode receiving over 50 million views. The show just rarely gets talked about outside of social media, but that does not mean it is not it is notable enough to have it is own Wikipedia article. BrainCraft is a show that airs on YouTube yet it has its own Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Br Miller (talk • contribs) 10:21, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Br Miller, the existence of one article (good or bad) does not mean that we must have an article about a related subject. Every page is judged on its own merits. Sometimes bad pages slip through the cracks, and rather than use them as justification for creating more bad pages, we should be taking care of them. It looks like Raised By Zombies does not meet our inclusion criteria and should either be improved or deleted. Primefac (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
05:52:40, 10 December 2017 review of submission by Thesilentmajority
[edit]
Hi Whispering, I am requesting a re-review because I believe this artist has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, which are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] as specified in the Wikipedia's guidelines of notability of people. She has had reviews in the Sunday Times, Bergens Tidende (Norwegian National Paper) Been played on BBC Radio 1 and large American college radio and had a variety of reliable online tast maker music publications write about her work. She also has an existing wiki page for a previous project, which to me seems reason enough alone she to be considered "notable" I mean surely if she was notable then people would like to know what she's up to now? can you please advise what exactly is the issue here because I believe I have followed the Wiki guidlines and satisfied the notability factor. Thanks for your time.
- Actually you didn't add any new references between the time KGirlTrucker81 declined the article and I reviewed it again. The history page shows that you linked a couple of pages however you didn't add any new references. Thus I reviewed it how I did, the last reviewer found the references lacking so I trusted their judgement. Whispering 22:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi whispering.
- I'm confused here, completely, and would appreciate an impartial second opinion. I asked for a second opinion because I believe I have satisfied Wikipedia's rules on notability with the references used in the first submission.
These references contain national Newspapers like The Sunday Times, and Norwegian National Newspaper Bergens Tidende Music taste maker publications like Clash Magazine and various others which all have Wikipedia pages themselves. How are these references not notable?
The first reviewer of this submission said the following "@Thesilentmajority: Currently, your only unreliable source is pointing to Facebook. Please review WP:N and remove it once you've familiarized with the guideline. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 13:21, 24 November 2017 (UTC)"
I don't understand this statement we are talking about reliable resources right?
So - I am please asking you to review this submission based on your own opinions not the opinions of the first reviewer so I can get an impartial second opinion on why these references are not notable enough.
~~~~ thank-you.
15:28:20, 11 December 2017 review of submission by Vtingole
[edit]
Am I suppose to submit the the supporting documents? If yes whether in PDF or else. Please let me know.
thanks & regards
VTIngole — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vtingole (talk • contribs) 15:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
- You might want to check out WP:CITE and WP:RS those two pages can explain better than I can. Please note that blogs aren't considered reliable sources. Whispering 05:08, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
[edit]Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
- Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
- If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with:
{{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
- A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
- Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
- ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
- The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Your decline
[edit]Your decline here [1]. I left a reply to you. FHHedlund (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
01:52:38, 17 December 2017 review of submission by 8irthofaNation
[edit]
We have made many edits, please re-review. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8irthofaNation (talk • contribs) 01:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Request on 08:41:01, 17 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Nguyen Dang Kieu Dong
[edit]
Youtube videos are the only version for references that were found
Hello, I know that Youtube videos are usually considered as unreliable sources. However, is that possible to cite the Youtube video that was posted by the original producer? Because in my case, I took the video from the Youtube page of VTV - which is the Vietnamese national TV channel. They did not post the video on their main webpage, only one version is available on Youtube.
Nguyen Dang Kieu Dong (talk) 08:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
Why did you say No to my Sandbox?
[edit]WHY did you do it? I just want to have an article about me! Hydra Tacoz (talk) 00:07, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
Deletion of Omega Tau Podcast
[edit]You deleted the page Omega Tau Podcast just five hours after it was created, in the middle of the night (for Europe), so that no discussion was possible. You did not even let me the time to save a draft and continue working on it, but just destroyed the work, without any respect.
Think about that Wikipedia is not your property but a democratic project. No one will be disturbed by a new page in work which already contains informations but still is incomplete. On the other hand, with your dictatorial methods you demotivate users who might give a positive contribution to Wikipedia, and as I see in your discussion page, I am not the only one. You pretend to be the best and destroy the work of the others.
Omega Tau is a science and engineering podcast which has the same right to be on Wikipedia as a book. Since it contains interviews to experts in the fields, it can be used as a source for scientific and technical information exactly as a book.
I just began translating the German page but you deleted it with your dictatorial methods before I or someone else could continue. Please, reverse what you did, wait a week and think about it again. --Eio (talk) 07:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Eio, Whispering only nominated the page for deletion because it did not meet our criteria for inclusion. I am sure that you can have the content restored and moved to the Draft space so that you can continue working on it, but in order to make that request you will need to ask at User talk:Anthony Appleyard, as they are the admin that deleted the page. Primefac (talk) 14:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
- Thank you for the hint, Primefac.
- Still, Whispering may have all the reasons of the world to delete the page, but doing it without leaving any trace and without the possibility of a discussion is respectless. Apparently, if we read his discussion page, it is the usual way how he or she works on Wikipedia, destroying the work of the others and demotivating them with his dictatorial behaviour. There are many users who do not know the code of Wikipedia by hearth like Dr. Whispering, but still Wikipedia takes advantage of their volontary work and a bit of respect is in my view necessary. -Eio (talk) 21:55, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- First off it's he, and secondly I was just following the guidelines of Wikipedia. The onus is on you as the article creator to have the article ready for inclusion when you post it including reasons of why said podcast is notable and references to back those claims up. If you haven't got those ducks in a row before posting the article I would suggest working on it in draft space first. Whispering 00:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Your signature
[edit]Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.
You are encouraged to change
<b><font color="#3949AB">[[User:Whispering|Whispe]]</font><font color="#FF6F00">[[User talk:Whispering|ring]]</font></b>: Whispering
to
<b>[[User:Whispering|<span style="color: #3949AB;">Whispe</span>]][[User talk:Whispering|<span style="color: #FF6F00;">ring</span>]]</b>: Whispering
—Anomalocaris (talk) 19:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
New Years new page backlog drive
[edit]Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
- The total number of reviews completed for the month.
- The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
Archiving Talk
[edit]I am having trouble archiving talk page Talk:World War II casualties of the Soviet Union, can you please help--Woogie10w (talk) 00:54, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm the absolute wrong person to ask that I have my own issues with archiving talk pages but there is a helpful page about the subject. Help:Archiving a talk page. Whispering 01:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)