User talk:Vinodh Moodley

Welcome

File:Verifiability and Neutral point of view (Common Craft)-en.ogv

A video showing the basics of verifiability and neutral point of view policies.

Welcome!

Hello, Vinodh Moodley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 15:18, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greger Huttu (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greger Huttu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Vinodh Moodley, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Greger Huttu concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Greger Huttu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Greger Huttu

Hello, Vinodh Moodley. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Greger Huttu".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 T C 17:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: USB OTG

Firstly, we have certain requirements for what constitutes a reliable secondary source. They must have a "reputation for fact-checking and accuracy"; please see WP:RS for further details and requirements.

Secondly, your remarks imply that you wish to edit the article based upon personal experiences. That is also a violation of Wikipedia policies forbidding "original research". ViperSnake151 Talk 12:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My remark did not imply that I wish to edit the article based on personal experiences. That was what you decided it mean't. I was only trying to bring the article up to date since the Nexus 6 was officially updated to Android 6 and USB OTG is now supported. If I wanted to bring my personal experiences into it as you say, then I would have made a Youtube video about the Nexus 6 and link the article to that instead of a blog that I found that has nothing to do with me.

Also, I was hoping for you to have shown me a way forward and not criticise me for something I didn't actually do. The bottom line is that the current version of the article is inaccurate and needs to be corrected to show the current features of the Nexus 6.

Vinodh Moodley (talk) 13:13, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your request for positivity, but you must comply with all relevant Wikipedia policies. ViperSnake151 Talk 14:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]