User talk:Vihaan Khatri

Welcome

Hello, Vihaan Khatri, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Grayfell (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Anglo Pyramidologist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 03:26, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vihaan Khatri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Hi, I have been blocked as a "sock-puppet" of someone else, but I am not one. If you the check the sock-puppet case page [1] there appears to be only one comment "This was an obvious sock, but I initially struggled to identify the master". No evidence has been presented that I am an "obvious" sock and no technical evidence.

I worked in the past for Hope Not Hate in the UK and now I am active monitoring the far-right for several online watchdog websites, happy to email if need be. I joined Wikipedia to warn editors about a far-right individual Emil Kirkegaard who has been editing an article on a controversial racist eugenics conference that he attended.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center "Emil Kirkegaard, who edits frequently under the username Deleet, is a research fellow at Richard Lynn’s Ulster Institute for Social research and the co-founder of the online pseudojournal OpenPsych." [2]

The sock-puppet investigation was filed by [3] a user called Godotskimp, an obvious sock of Emil Kirkegaard who virtually has no other edits apart from on intelligence which matches Kirkegaard's editing history[4] - [5]. Can an admin please sort this out? Please remove my account as a "sock-puppet".

Decline reason:

I'm going to decline this. Even if you were not a sockpuppet, your sole purpose here clearly is to harass another editor, which is not acceptable. Huon (talk) 09:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Follow-up pings to admins/CUs familiar with this case: Callanecc, Opabinia regalis, Doug Weller. Your thoughts are much appreciated. Regards, GAB^gab 01:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]