User talk:Utcursch/archive/20
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Utcursch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archives: 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:06, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Collie
'edits upto Torchwood Four were constructive', Does this mean mine weren't constructive, or others but mine? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torchwood Four (talk • contribs) 01:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:87.243.194.60
Please check the block you placed on User talk:87.243.194.60. He has vandalized the page after the block. Thanks. Alexf(t/c) 16:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks. Alexf(t/c) 16:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi I am chair of 1902.1 work group at IEEE 1902.1 - you removed a large section of the RuBee site that many found useful - it was backed up with references and had details that are important to understanding RuBee - no discussion was posted by you when you did it ? none not a word
Can you please explain why it was removed - it was considered informative by many - I have received many email complaints - lot of work went into those sections by many people
Please explain your rational - especially deleting the 15 total references to other wiki pages
Ho do we restore back to the original ?
Thanks John Stevens
john@rubee.org —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkmstevens (talk • contribs) 15:05, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Daniel Quinlan/gaming (talk) was deleted again. Please help this poor guy. --75.100.7.49 07:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Yoga poll
Hi! There's some discussion on whether using "asana", "yogasana" or "yoga asana" as the article title. If you are acquainted with the subject, you are invited to drop your opinion at Talk:Yogasana#Opinion Poll on this article's name. Davin7 09:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Hello!
Hello ut! How are you? ut, can you delete my user page and talk page? I know it sounds strange. I want to recreate my user page and my talk page. Thank you. RS1900 04:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ut, please delete my user page and talk page as soon as you see this message. Thank you. RS1900 05:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- And, please delete all the sub-pages also! I want to recreate everything. So, delete all the sub-pages. Thank you. RS1900 05:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- And, what about the talk page? If I put {{db-author}} on my user talk page will it also be deleted? RS1900 11:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ut, can you delete my user talk page? Thank you. RS1900 13:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply! I didn't knew that user talk pages are not deleted. Good luck! RS1900 13:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ut, can you delete my user talk page? Thank you. RS1900 13:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- And, what about the talk page? If I put {{db-author}} on my user talk page will it also be deleted? RS1900 11:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- And, please delete all the sub-pages also! I want to recreate everything. So, delete all the sub-pages. Thank you. RS1900 05:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank for the help. Now, I understand the rules better. RS1900 05:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
problems with Prentice position
I came across this article and was baffled in some respects. I left a note on the talk page, and as you are an early editor of the article, I'm asking if you would talk a look at the problems I noted. Thanks. ww 06:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
<blush> Thank for the barnstar! --Zeborah 09:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Charity on Darfur conflict page
Hi -- Thanks for your contributions to the Darfur conflict page. I noticed you added Kids for Kids in the "See also" section. As a way to keep that list manageable, as there are dozens and dozens of charities working on the issue, it was decided to move all such links to the Bibliography of the Darfur conflict page. While your link to Kids for Kids has been removed from the main Darfur conflict page, you are welcome to add it to the bibliography page. Best, ivan 00:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Please delete Bhat (food)
I have updated the Bhat page so this page is no longer needed, please delete.
And sorry for those trouble, I am still learning :) A.koirala 15:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 36 | 3 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 05:48, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
My RFA | ||
I thank you for participating in my successful request for adminship, which ended with 60 supports, no opposes, no neutrals, and one abstain. Edison 17:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 37 | 10 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 21:08, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Blocking
I'm unsure of this. Some of the content the person removed contained pretty shaky unsourced information, and could be BLP in some way... --DarkFalls talk 14:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Never mind... you've already unblocked :)--DarkFalls talk 14:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Ok
Thanks for tip, I'll look into it! Oh and why is your writing so small? Phgao 09:05, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- I just had a look, it looks complicated... Can you lead me through it? Oh and I'm off now. Phgao 09:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, right! Thanks so much, those boxes on the top are nice! Phgao 11:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ok I just tried using it, and the boxes don't work when I click on them?! Phgao 11:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, right! Thanks so much, those boxes on the top are nice! Phgao 11:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- I just had a look, it looks complicated... Can you lead me through it? Oh and I'm off now. Phgao 09:07, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
HI friend, thank you for your welcome note , "Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! ", really they are scaring me off, what ever I edit, some people are purposefully removing and deleting that. If I felt like unnecessarily being screwed up, what can I do, how can I get Justice. Hope you will help me, thanks in advance, cheers, --IndiWorld 10:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
I am being threatened
Hi friend, as you know I am new to wikipedia, the following person is trying to threaten me http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AmarrgSmall Text he is confusing me some IP address that this and all, which I really cant understand. If I have done something wrong you kindly indicate and help me. Looking forward for your support. Regards. --IndiWorld 11:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the reformatting on the Westfield High School article. I hope that the article will continue to be improved by additional worthy contributors such as you. LonelyBeacon 15:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Block of Conard High School
Hi. I was about to block them when I saw you had.
I was only going to give them 8 hours, as it's a Friday and that would cover the rest of the school day in the eastern US. 24 hours is sort of a waste of most of the block as the computers likely won't be in use tonight and tomorrow, and I'm not going to make a first-time block of 96 hours just so they get the full impact of a first-time block.
Just a thought for future school IP blocks. Daniel Case 15:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Thirukkural
Hi, I tried in vain to include Bharatidasan's and V.R.Nedunchezhiyan's names under the sub heading Thirukkural and Religion. Wonder if you could let me know why it is so? Thanks S.Ratnakumar 07:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
- Just add a source -- that's what the person who removed the sentence wanted. utcursch | talk 11:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
I've removed Ben's comment from the main article, I see you've been working on it too...just considering how much of that lead paragraph on "Wittering on" we need to get rid of? A lot of it is unnecessary and POV. Liverpool Scouse 12:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- May be some of it (the stuff about "wittering on") should go to Wiktionary. utcursch | talk 12:53, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 17th, 2007.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 38 | 17 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 03:55, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Anand Jain
Hi Utcursch,
Indians are a big fan of neutral information site like Wikipedia.org. However some information about our respected Industry icons have been dragged in press and media for political and mischevious reasons best known to people who carry such acts.
Mr. Anand Jain is a very respected figure in Indian Industry and we as part of the largest Indian and Fortune 500 company would like to put the correct information and remove all misinformation and mischevious remarks from a great site like Wikipedia.org.
We will assure the managers of WIkipedia.org that all the information we will incorporate in the site will be correct and accurate and will be updated regularly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.199.41.156 (talk) 13:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
- I've re-worded the sentence that you seem to have problem with. Please have a look at the article, and feel free to discuss the matter. Thank you! utcursch | talk 13:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
The information has been removed because its false. We will ensure that the right information stays on wikipedia.org. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ril editor (talk • contribs) 05:30, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for the barnstar you are really kind JennyLen☤ 14:17, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
Semi-protect request
Hi Utcursch! Sorry to bother you, but could you please semi-protect the Philippines article? It's been getting a lot of attention from anonymous vandals over the last few hours. :( --SilentAria talk 16:37, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the swift response and the tip! :) --SilentAria talk 16:44, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
The now-traditional RFA thank-spam
Dear Utcursch/archive,
Thank you for your participation in my RFA, which closed successfully with 83 supports, 1 oppose, and 0 neutrals. No matter if you voted (I mean, "!voted") support or oppose, I thank you for taking the time to drop by. I'm new, remember, so if you have any suggestions feel free to inform me of them, and if I do anything wrong, feel free to add to the permanent chorus of disapproval on my talk page. Special thanks to WaltonOne and Dihydrogen Monoxide for nominating me.
Credits
This design was brazenly stolen from inspired by Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor's RFA Thanks, which in turn was inspired by Phaedriel's RFA thanks.
Thanks for the help.
Thank you for writing that little warning to the guy who put the nasty stuff on my talk page. I usually don't make a big deal about petty vandalism, but that was pretty offensive. Bassgoonist T C 20:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
Hey
Hi what do you think about the Lata Mangeshkar and Asha Bhosle artices? I'd like to know what their level is. There is much of information and I think we can take them to WP:PR, what do you think? --Shahid • Talk2me 15:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oops sorry I didn't notice your last message. So it's OK we'll take it to WP:PR. I guess the Asha article will be first. Best regards, --Shahid • Talk2me 15:48, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks!
My RFA | ||
Thanks for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 58 supports, 1 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified. Addhoc 19:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC) |
Kattankudi Incident
Hi, I think your argument were very persuasive and hence I am willing to recall my deletion vote (as nominator) provided I can get some admin help to cleanup the NPOV and gory image issue on the article. Sinhala freedom 12:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 24th, 2007.
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Go get 'em tiger
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I hereby award you this barnstar for your great work in smashing the vandals! Keep up the great work!!! -- ALLSTAR ECHO 13:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for reverting this IPs edit on his talkpage. I've noticed something about this IP, which has led me to think he is a suspected sockpuppet. To comment on the situation (sorry to get you involved but I thought you'd like to know!), please do so here. Thanks, Davnel03 15:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Another question
I've requested for a peer review for Ashaji's article for now. I wanted to ask you, do you have any books or bibliography sources for Asha, as it appears in Lataji's Further reading section? I think it will be quite needed for a FA of a legendary veteran singer. Best regards, --Shahid • Talk2me 22:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
Question
Is there not something else that can be done for User talk:74.255.97.11? This account only seems to be doing vandalizing and I see that they have been "temporarily" blocked (now) five times and have received four last/only warnings. They go right back to vandalizing once the block is lifted. Is there anything else that can be done? Thanks! --Maniwar (talk) 16:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, thanks for all that you do. --Maniwar (talk) 16:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
I sent you one. Cheers, Daniel 02:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 03, 2007
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 40 | 1 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|