User talk:Ustc309

October 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. stwalkerster (talk) 09:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ustc309 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I have written a test purpose page article if my edit is perfect or not. Come on this is a Sandbox article, why I get blocked? where is the policy violation? Isn't sandbox for practice?

Decline reason:

Your sandbox article was so completely inappropriate that we blocked you to ensure you understand how completely inappropriate it was. Nothing here demonstrates to me that you understand this. You seem to think maybe your test edit was "perfect" or close to it. That's deeply concerning. We need you to convince us you understand, by pointing to which policies would apply and by explaining how your future edits would be different. Yamla (talk) 10:15, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ustc309 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can see you have told that my sandbox article was so completely inappropriate that's why you blocked me. As I know sandbox article is for testing the skill, I didn't even submit the article for review. So how a draft article can break the rules? If there was an error you guys can show me that this is not appropriate and need to edit before submit for review then publish. But why you guys blocked me?

Decline reason:

You have found out the hard way that all edits to Wikipedia are public, and your sandbox is not immune from deletion processes. Your draft was a blatant advertisement. You haven't even gotten into the stated reason for the block, sock puppetry, as you created this account to evade the block on your other account. You personally are blocked, not just your account. You may not edit under any account or IP address until the block on your original account is removed. You must return there to address this matter. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.