User talk:Track 9
Regarding Linkin Park
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 02:13, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Checkuser
[edit]If you aren't ItHysteria, there's little reason to be worried. He's a banned editor, and you have enough things in common with him to make me suspicious. Your edits will be examined with tools that regular editors don't have access to to see if you are editing from the same locations he does. If not, then nothing will happen to your account.—Kww(talk) 01:42, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm sorry, but I did not know about the checkuser. Thanks.--Track 9 (talk) 01:49, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Track 9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As I said before, I'm not ItHysteria, I have never edited on Italian Wikipedia and my only account is Track 9. I don't understand why my Edouard Salier's page and my edits were deleted. I don't understand this block. I wasn't aware that the types of edits I made were wrong so please, tell me my errors now, just because I didn't find any error in my edits.
Decline reason:
I defer to the reasoning at the SPI. You may, of course, wish to have another checkuser review this as well. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Track 9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please, listen to me. I'm not ItHysteria. Can someone explain to me why I'm blocked? I think that I did nothing wrong. If I did something wrong, I won't do it again. Please, help me. Regards.
Decline reason:
Possibility 1: You are telling the truth. This means that, purely by coincidence, you are using the same ip address to make the same edits as another person. This is, to say the least, difficult to believe. Possibility 2: You are not telling the truth, but, like nearly all users of multiple accounts, are claiming to be someone you are not. My experience tells me that this is the more likely scenario, since it happens literally every day at Wikipedia. I am not able to justify undoing the block, since I'm not able to demonstrate reasonable doubt that it is an error. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Track 9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Now I don't know what to say. I'm not ItHysteria and I did nothing wrong. Again, if I did something wrong, I won't do it again. Please, help me.
Decline reason:
Sorry, but given the small detail that the reason you have this account name is that you changed it from User:Unwish, and that it:User:Unwish is blocked as a sock of a sock of ItHysteria, your story doesn't hold up. --jpgordon::==( o ) 00:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Track 9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What should I say? What is the reason for this block? If I did something wrong, I won't do it again. I'm not ItHysteria, as I said before I'm not the Unwish of Italian Wikipedia. I have registered on English Wikipedia with the name Unwish, then I changed my name in Track 9. I edited only on English and Spanish Wikipedia. I have never edited on Italian Wikipedia, I can't log on it and I don't know why. I don't understand this block. I tell you everything. Now I don't know what to say.
Decline reason:
There is both behavioral and technical evidence that you are in fact the sockpuppet of a banned user. This has been repeatedly explained to you. I wil now be revoking your ability to appeal your block in this manner, if you wish to make further appeals you will need to directly email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:48, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.