User talk:Ub0r
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Wikipedia must die, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.myjc.com/opinion/computer-opinion/100-why-wikipedia-must-die.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Your contributions all seem to be attempts to vandalize Wikipedia. Please be more careful, and give reasons why the contributions are not wrong, or you will be blocked. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Notice
[edit]
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.
December 2008
[edit] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alex Jones (radio host), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Willking1979 (talk) 02:35, 8 December 2008 (UTC)