User talk:Franciselliott

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Manzoni-linee.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Manzoni-linee.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:28, 3 May 2008 (UTC)==Image copyright problem with Image:Schwitters.jpg==[reply]

Image Copyright problem

Hi Trevelyanhouse!
We thank you for uploading Image:Schwitters.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox proposal

Hi, I'trying to keep the infobox proposal page in a tidier system using subpages for each proposal. This allows each proposal to be worked on individually, building up edit history, its own discussion page and if required a documentation page for the template. Going "live" then a simple page rename/move.

Hence see Wikipedia:List_of_infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox Artist's Books and Multiples :-)

(Care to choose a more succint name though ?)

I can help you develop the template (but my time for wikipedia shall be very limited for next few days). David Ruben ^Talk 03:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - thanks for the section header on my talk page. Ok, to develop the proposed template, lets start discussing some points at Wikipedia talk:List of infoboxes/Proposed/Infobox Artist's Books and Multiples - you don't need to be a wikiexpert or coding-guru, just help me understand better the articles where it might be used and the best use & terminology for the various parameters :-) Yours David Ruben ^Talk 16:59, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pink Frost

I played drums on it, and that's a fact, because Craig (a New Zealander, who was the road manager for Savage Progress) asked me to. It was bloody difficult, because of the time changes.--andreasegde (talk) 01:07, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I answered on my talk page. :)--andreasegde (talk) 16:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Any word about The Chills session in London? :)--andreasegde (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hey. Please only move pages by using the move function. Cut-and-paste moves are not allowed as those split the edit history and thus violate GFDL. If the move function doesn't work (target page has more than one edit), or the move might be controversial, you can list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Thanks, Prolog (talk) 19:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coltrane Album Release Date

Hello. I've noticed that you have changed a lot of the "last album"/"next album" entries for John Coltrane albums. I was wondering if you had a guide or source providing you with the precise release date, as all I have for most of Trane is the year, nothing more specific. Such a source would of particular use for John Coltrane discography. Thanks much---Editor437 (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that link looks quite useful -- I suspect a number of articles on Coltrane albums have the wrong release date (often someone - usually me - just put the recording date).

I think the chronology could either go by release or recording date -- as long as one or the other is consistently used -- since there's over a hundred albums in Trane's discography, release date makes sense, even if key albums are omitted. CheersEditor437 (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that would be useful -- another example would be Giant Steps and Kind of Blue, very different albums recorded at the same time.--Editor437 (talk) 22:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PD

I can't find the Mondrian image you allude to. You may well have been bothering with long-winded reasons needlessly. See Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tags/Public_domain#Art, particularly "{{PD-art-US}} — for images of 2-D (flat) works of art published prior to 1923". Ty 02:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

WikiProject Visual arts

You are welcome to join WikiProject Visual arts, a collaboration between like-minded Wikipedians in order to improve visual arts coverage.

Ty 02:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Evans reedsville 1936.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Evans reedsville 1936.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I deleted it because it seemed out of place; mentioning that people have seen a link between Evans and Ruscha is quite different from including the picture on a page about Ruscha; anyone who wants to see it for themselves can easily find it. Also, in retrospect, it isn't really that similar at all, using a much more traditional near/far composition.Franciselliott (talk) 08:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

Hi, I've nominated an article you created, Russian Ballet (book), for consideration to appear in the Wikipedia:Did you know section of the Main Page. You can see the hook I created for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on September 29 where you can improve it if you see fit. --Bruce1ee^talk 08:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Russian Ballet (book)

On 5 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Russian Ballet (book), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations! --Bruce1ee^talk 05:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question about publisher of first edtion of Twentysix Gasoline Stations

I'm getting conflicting information about the publisher of record for the first edition. I noted your replacement of Cunningham with Heavy Industry Publications for the first edition of Twentysix Gasoline Stations. I've been able to find several catalog records, UCLA's is one, which indicate unambiguously (not necessarily correctly) that Cunningham was the publisher of the first edition. Do you have a citation for Heavy Industry Publications being the correct publisher? The UCLA catalog record indicates no place of publication or publisher was printed in the first edition (at least). I'm not passionate, just looking for accuracy. --Quartermaster (talk) 23:21, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contacting you, Warja Lavater, etc.

I would like to contact you (low level, low stress) but you haven't enabled the "email the user" facility for your wikipedia account. Mine can be found here.

Just general interest. I've noted that you've published artists' books and am interested in your specific works. My introduction to this area was accidental as I purchased a boxed set of Warja Lavater's Imageries almost 20 years ago - I had no idea what I had, but I knew it was something special. Lavater has never gotten much credit for her work (though it has steadily grown over time) so I'm attuned to artists who may not be as visible as people like Edward Ruscha. He's obviously a beneficiary of USA-centric bias as evidenced by the fact that the works of Dieter Roth precede him, and, as I posit, so does the work of Lavater. I wouldn't be surprised if other artists who created artists' books will continue to come to light pre-dating Ruscha's Twentysix Gasoline Stations. This doesn't denigrate Ruscha's work at all since his activities were apparently uninfluenced by these other artists (Lavater and Roth, et al?). It's a fascinating field, and I'm just an anal retentive librarian who took one too many course in analytical bibliography.

--Quartermaster (talk) 15:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yves-cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yves-cover.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 12:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Jazz in Silhouette.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jazz in Silhouette.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Combines

I hope to add more material on Rauschenberg's Combines in the next week or so but in the meantime is there any chance of moving the image you just added out of the Biography section and down to the section on the White, Black and Red Paintings section. There is a short mention of the Combines there now and I'll be adding more later.(olive (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lewis wyndham.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lewis wyndham.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:11, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Franciselliott. You have new messages at Tedder's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

tedder (talk) 20:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fluxus 1

On June 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fluxus 1, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wizardman 08:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

George Brecht photo

The new George Brecht photo was scanned from an art journal. Is that OK? Otherwise I can remove it. Please advise. Valueyou (talk) 08:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kandinsky-Klange.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kandinsky-Klange.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Yves-cover.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Yves-cover.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IKB 191.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IKB 191.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Xijky (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:FluxusTraitor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:FluxusTraitor.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Franciselliott. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 09:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Franciselliott. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 17:13, 11 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 17:13, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fluxus

Giuseppe Bartolomeo Chiari - Giuseppe Chiari was the artist I deleted; since another Giuseppe Chiari (artist) is a Fluxus artist then please make an article. Thanks...Modernist (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Make it yourself Franciselliott (talk) 00:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No thanks, you made the first addition, and make claims, you make the article...Modernist (talk) 01:22, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Artist's books and multiples

Category:Artist's books and multiples, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:00, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 00:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to join WikiProject Women artists!

Hello Franciselliott! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women artists. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women artists, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women artists on Wikipedia.

If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women artists page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

SarahStierch (talk) 10:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beuys-Piano.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beuys-Piano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dieter roth.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dieter roth.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flute solo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flute solo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:TransrationalBoog-Rozanova.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TransrationalBoog-Rozanova.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Franciselliott. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Merzbau.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Merzbau.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kruchenykh-2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kruchenykh-2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Yves;peinturev3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Yves;peinturev3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 07:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DoItYourselfBookshop.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DoItYourselfBookshop.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LiquorChess1975.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LiquorChess1975.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:HannahHoch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HannahHoch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]