User talk:Trailblazer101 (usurped)

Request for usurpation

Hello, Trailblazer101. A request has been made via Wikipedia:Changing username (or meta:SRUC) to usurp, or "take over", your username because another user would like to use it to edit. The changing username guideline allows a username that is not being actively used to be usurped if the user is given an opportunity to object and does not do so.

If you do not object to being renamed to a new username in order for another user to use the name you currently have, please log in and post a reply here saying so (you may also tell us what username you would like to be renamed to, or we will provide you with a generic one) or use Special:GlobalRenameRequest.

If you do nothing: the request may be filled shortly, and your account will be moved to a generic username. You may request that it be moved to a new username of your choice at any time.

If you object to being renamed: please log in and make an edit to this page clearly stating that you object to usurpation. Any objection on your part will prevent usurpation.

Please note that even if your current username is usurped, you can still edit and your data will not be lost; your preferences, watchlist, and other user settings will be transferred to a new username.

Thank you for your time. 101blazertrail (talk) 02:20, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Account usurped

This account has been usurped following a request made at Wikipedia:Changing username/Usurpations. This means that, to allow another user to use your old username, you have been renamed to "Trailblazer101 (usurped)". This is only done to users who have remained inactive for long periods of time and have not made any substantial edits.

You are welcome to continue using this new username. However, if you wish, you may also have your username changed to another one of your choosing by filling out this form, or by visiting the changing username page for other options.

If you have any questions, feel free to let me know at my talk page, or ask your question at the Teahouse, where friendly, experienced editors can assist you. You can also edit this page, add the {{Help me}} template, and then ask your question below, and a helper will be by shortly to help you out. Thank you for your understanding. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pokelego999 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of citations are WP:VALNET, which do not confer notability and is a generally low-quality source due to being a content farm, or WP:PRIMARY, hailing from Fandom, which is not secondary of the subject. The History section lacks any form of coverage on the actual community and only on things randomly mentioned by other sources in a broader topic, and Reception is primarily sourced to a PRIMARY source and trivial mentions. The entire "cited as a resource" section is also not valid for conferring notability, as generally being cited a lot doesn't confer notability, and the subject is relatively unmentioned outside of being cited in the article. I'm seeing very little WP:SIGCOV on this subject overall, and the current article is very barebones in terms of notability as it stands. Every source that is citing some important event featuring this subject is either cited PRIMARY or is just mentioned as being one of many groups participating in a major event, which does not grant independent notability. More SIGCOV is needed to show the subject's overall notability and meet notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Trailblazer101 (usurped)! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]