User talk:TommyVictor

May 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 21:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 (talk) 03:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you are deleting information that is sourced from the Batman v Superman page? You are not providing that reasoning, which is why you keep getting reverted. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 18:48, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If there are reliable sources that says another number, then we use them. You may want to read Template:Infobox film#Parameters. It specifically says to use a range if are reliable conflicts. We don't just use BOM simply because it's BOM. If you disagree that much, take it to the talk page. The idea the film cost 250 or 300 million doesn't impact the argument about the film flopping. The flopping isn't about profit, the flopping was about the expectation of the film (which Warner Bros. expected to be over 1 billion) and not meeting that. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 19:26, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How something is portrayed and the fact that there are reliable sources indicating a high budget are not the same thing. You cannot remove information that is reliably sourced simply to justify your personal argument about whether it is a flop or not. If you keep removing it, you will be reported and ultimately blocked from editing for being disruptive. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:27, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aiming for a longer ban? Please stop removing sourced content from articles. Thank you. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:00, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]