User talk:Toljin

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Susan Hutchison. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — CactusWriter | ^needles 20:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Susan Hutchison, you will be blocked from editing. I am not an "opponent" of Susan Hutchison, nor does this age belong to her. Please read WP:OWN. Refrain from removing the sourced text as this is considered vandalism. — CactusWriter | ^needles 21:00, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Hutchison

Wikipedia operates under the policies of verified information and reliable sources. Blanket deletions of sourced information from Wikipedia articles, as you have been doing, is considered vandalism. Furthermore, your statement that you are editing this article under the direction of Susan Hutchison as her employee is a clear conflict of interest and neutral point-of-view.. The subjects of articles do not own the articles about them (Please read WP:OWN( and WP strongly discourages individuals from editing articles about themselves, family, or coworkers. I advise you to take any disagreement you have with the present text to the article talk page where it can be discussed. Further persistence in removing sourced text without valid reason will be considered disruptive and result in your being blocked from editing. — CactusWriter | ^needles 21:16, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Susan Hutchison.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Susan Hutchison.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — CactusWriter | ^needles 18:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 02:41, 31 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.