User talk:Tlharin
A tag has been placed on Asmita Resource Centre for Women, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Asmita Resource Centre for Women and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Benon (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
I have added {{ Underconstruction }} to the top of the page for you to stop it being speedily deleted again, please feel free to add content and remove it when you are done. Unfortunately articles which are created that are very short or just have a link are usually speedily delted because most of them are done in bad faith and I apologise for tagging a page you where working on. Hopefully these links should help you on wikipedia and if you ever need any help feel free to contact me here.
|
'Role' account
[edit]I do not wish to make you feel at all unwelcome, as you are clearly acting in good faith, but it has come to my attention that you may be running a role (shared) account. This is not permitted by Wikipedia policy, and I recommend creating a separate account for each student. I am referring to your comments here, and I may be mistaken. If so, I apologise in advance. I am telling you this in order to give you time to resolve the problem and to warn you that you may get blocked if this continues, as many users are more trigger-happy than I. I believe there are circumstances when role accounts may be acceptable, and when I check those, I will get back to you. Just a friendly nudge. For further advice, drop me a line...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 11:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- A quick look at the meta role accounts page tells me that this use is not a permitted one, and that you will need to create separate accounts to avoid a block, sorry...... Dendodge .. TalkHelp 11:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Ditto from me, by creating separate user accounts it also ensures that everyone gets proper attribution to their work through the GDFL. Please continue contributing to wikipedia we always need the help :). If you need any more help on this and I or Den isn't around adding {{helpme}} to this page will attract another wikipedian to swing by and help. We have had several successful class editing projects, you can read about them here. All the best Benon (talk) 11:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
May 2008
[edit]
The recent edit you made to Asmita Resource Centre for Women constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 16:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Asmita Resource Centre for Women do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.jpg' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 00:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Asmita Resource Centre for Women
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Asmita Resource Centre for Women, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - NQ (talk) 09:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)