User talk:Tinyarmada

Welcome!

Hello, Tinyarmada, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like West Virginia AFL-CIO, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Triplestop x3 20:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of West Virginia AFL-CIO

A tag has been placed on West Virginia AFL-CIO, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Triplestop x3 20:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of West Virginia AFL-CIO

Another editor has nominated West Virginia AFL-CIO, an article that you created, for deletion. He or she does not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Virginia AFL-CIO. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Radakovich (January 11)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chris1834 (talk) 16:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich

Hello Tinyarmada. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ruth Radakovich".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:12, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth Radakovich (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StarryGrandma (talk) 01:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Without major exhibitions or awards you need to make more of a case for this artist having an article. We need to meet the notability requirements at Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Creative professionals. Most of the references just mention her name. The article doesn't say anything about the jewelry she made. Go through her artistic development chronologically. Find articles or entries in books and exhibition catalogs that describe and analyze her work. Use those references as sources for the text you write.

The criteria are:

Authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.
The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

StarryGrandma (talk) 05:35, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[user:tinyarmada] I don't think you understand that Craftsman USA exhibits in NYC and Objects USA exhibition (which traveled to 30 cities in 2 years and produced a major publication) were they largest and most important exhibitions for American studio arts of the period. It doesn't get more important or recognized than those exhibits which they were included in, but these exhibits didn't give "awards"

Ruth and Toza's work has been featured in no less than 20 major books on jewelry, usually on the cover. Should I just make a list of all the awards and publications they received? Is that's what's needed?

Bad TV show fictional characters get wiki entries of embarrassing length so I'm confused of how a real, very important artist from the studio craft movement can keep getting rejected for a rather modest entry.[user:tinyarmada]

Hello! Tinyarmada, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich

Hello Tinyarmada. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ruth Radakovich".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Radakovich}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]