Jump to content

User talk:Tintantuckle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Raymond Taylor moved to draftspace

[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Lewis Raymond Taylor. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Tintantuckle. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tintantuckle. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tintantuckle|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Theroadislong, addresing your concern, i am not being paid or edit the article, i found the person noteworthy and created the page and also i am improving the page as i am seeing any issue i am not much experienced to create articles, either way im positive and im looking forward creating more good pages. thank you Tintantuckle (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Amy Sinton

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Tintantuckle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amy Sinton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Adnanjavidkhan1 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shivangi1738. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The WordsmithTalk to me 02:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tintantuckle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

im not a sockpuppet i have no connection to this account, im trying to contribute to wikipedia and i have created some pages that are notable to be included but this reviewer named GSS has tagged all of them with UPE i have no financial stake on any of those, im contributing and trying my best to make sure im on the right path, i have caused no issues on Wikipedia whatsoever and i cooperate with other's decisions who have upper rights and more knowledge, im learning and implying so i can contribute in better ways, Thanks! Please consider my unblock. I have not abused wikipedia and the knowledge it provides to millions of readers.Tintantuckle (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I suspect that this is actually meat puppetry, which is treated the same as sock puppetry. You will need to explain how you came to do the exact same things as the other accounts described in the SPI if you have no connection to them. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tintantuckle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

331dot i had created the page Ayaan Khan but i do not know why this user Shivangi1738 voted in favour as i wrote the Ayaan Khan page because it was a musician that i have had known for a while and he was aware that i have created his page and also notified him that it is not yet notable and it most probably get deleted due to nomination, this Shivangi1738 someone who was connected to Ayaan Khan and not me maybe hired by him to fix this issue and also the other one Supercat9906, since then they had been continuously interfering with my pages and edits that followed their contributions in my pages, i am not aware who they are how they are related but i wanted me block to be removed as i have done nothing wrong or abused any rights that were given to me, i have always support the fellow contributors with their decisions. Thank you for considering, hope i get a chance to prove myself once that i am here to contribute and help this community only. Tintantuckle (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:21, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tintantuckle&oldid=1229967921"