User talk:Thomasbelloofficial

Welcome!

Hello, Thomasbelloofficial, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Flag of Venezuela may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:Flag of Venezuela (1954-2006).png|thumb|Flag of Republic of Venezuela 1954-2006.]]|23x15px]] 7-star Flag of Venezuela with coat of arms, in use 1954–2006.]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Thomasbelloofficial", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because this "official" thing makes it look like a role account. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:43, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Venezuela. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 18:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{Respuesta usuario}

User Jp16103 has been denounced for systematically editing and changing the Venezuelan flag file. Your editions are not correct. Librarians take action on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thomasbelloofficial (talk • contribs) 18:28, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that Jp16103 has been denounced by anyone but you. If you continue to edit war over this content, despite citations that support the changes made and without engaging in Talk page discussion concerning the change, you will be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 18:34, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Even if there are minor variations between the current SVG file and the official flag (which you have yet to prove), your continued reversion without discussing those variations and seeking consensus will result in your being blocked. General Ization ^Talk 18:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned about your tendentious editing at Venezuela and Flag of Venezuela concerning the flag SVG. You have also been invited to participate in the discussion on the article's Talk page, which you have so far failed to do. If you continue to engage in the former without doing the latter, I will bring the matter to the attention of administrators, with the probable outcome that you will be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 22:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Venezuela.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 03:33, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Venezuela.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 03:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. NeilN ^{talk to me} 04:35, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]