User talk:The hobgoblin

To the bar.

NPA

With regards to your comments in this edit summary: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. "Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users." Please keep this in mind while editing. Thanks. · j e r s y k o talk · 18:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My warning against making personal attacks applies to all pages on Wikipedia, including my talk page. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Don't make another attack. · j e r s y k o talk · 21:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War

I'm usually not this hard-headed when dealing with people that don't want to listen. Can any civility come out of this? Shakam 05:19, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I See

I see that you missed the whole point; furthermore, I only have said signature at one forum, for what purposes did you find it?

BTW (by the way), I'm not a mathematician, but I'm sure if I would have reexamined the equation (it was made to illustrate a point, seeing as 0 would never occur in such a sense) I would have fixed it. But thanks for "enlightening" me. Shakam 9 November 2006 (UTC)

NPA, again

[1] - Just because someone disagrees with you doesn't give you the right to call them a vandal or accuse them of racial self-hatred, which is a severe violation of WP:NPA. Also, this edit: [2] - don't forget WP:CIVIL and Wikipedia is not a soapbox - JScott06 07:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're entitled to your opinion, but Wikipedia isn't a soapbox. The talk page is for discussion of the content of the article, not your personal views. - JScott06 04:19, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPA, again, again

[3] - This is your last warning. You have had many. If you can't be civil while interacting with fellow Wikipedians then you are not welcome here. You will be blocked for any further personal attacks I am witness to. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 01:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

After witnessing your highly uncivil edit summary here and noticing that you've been warned ad nauseum for such behavior in the past, I've blocked you for 24 hours. If you continue acting in such fashion after the block has expired, you will face much longer blocks. AmiDaniel (talk) 02:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)\[reply]

Parts of your edit to Talk:Mulatto [4] have been removed as offensive. Be assured any repetitions will be dealt with swiftly, SqueakBox 16:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

Please read above article and undo your last edit which is invalid, SqueakBox 19:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

Regarding reversions[5] made on November 29 2006 to Mulatto

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 24 hours. William M. Connolley 20:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked

I've indefinitely blocked this account from editing. See your block log for an explanation. Please take a few moments to reconsider such disruptive behavior. Thank you. Luna Santin 00:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]