User talk:TheWikiEditor1234

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 21:52, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, C-3PO & R2-D2

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, C-3PO & R2-D2. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – R2-D2. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at R2-D2. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tom Clayton (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Clayton (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Clayton (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheWikiEditor1234! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Page Protection, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheWikiEditor1234! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Film / TV Poster, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheWikiEditor1234! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, New Page Creation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Crystal Palace 0–7 Liverpool for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crystal Palace 0–7 Liverpool is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crystal Palace 0–7 Liverpool until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dr_Salvus (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Writing about a football match

When writing about a match like the Liverpool-Barcelona one, can you please ensure that you write in a neutral tone? Saying that a player "mashed it home with an amazing finish" is completely inappropriate -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisTheDude, thanks for your feedback, I will speak in a more neutral tone. TheWikiEditor1234 (talk) 16:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate articles

Hi there!

Just to let you know, I have redirected two articles you created, because the players in question already had articles. Jack Smith (footballer, born 1927) already had an article under John Smith (footballer, born 1927) and Tiny Bradshaw (footballer) already had an article under Tom Bradshaw (footballer, born 1904) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion of User:DDP-Trooper1777

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWikiEditor1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sure why have I've been blocked, please can you look into this. I have not made any abusive edits, and I have created many pages with source, it would be devastating if I get blocked for no reason. Thanks TheWikiEditor1234 (talk) 20:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. Yamla (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWikiEditor1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see what the problem is, I have spoken to one of my family members, who goes by the name of DDP-Trooper1777 on wikipedia and they have to me that they have been blocked. As we use the same device, this might be the case. Please could you not penalise me for my family member being blocked. Thanks. TheWikiEditor1234 (talk) 07:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer or holding the device editing. Please see WP:MEAT. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheWikiEditor1234 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have looked at the desruptive edits my family member has made, and you can clearly see that there is a difference between my edits and theres. I have not made any desriptive edits. TheWikiEditor1234 (talk) 11:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: I did not block you because I figured out multiple accounts were using the same device, I blocked you because it's blindingly obvious that User:DDP-Trooper1777, User:MasterDDP-1777 and User:MasterD.D. Patel plus several others, at a bare minimum, are the same person. Canterbury Tail talk 12:30, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool 4–0 Barcelona until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dr_Salvus (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]