User talk:Tarungarg6666

July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to National Institutes of Technology has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: National Institutes of Technology was changed by Tarungarg6666 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863123 on 2015-07-04T18:16:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:16, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I noticed that you made a change to an article, National Institutes of Technology, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to List of National Institutes of Technology. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. KSFT ^C 18:37, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KSFT ^C 18:39, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re: For a reason

Re your message: You can not include such a list because it appears to be an arbitrary ranking. You must provide a source for the ranking, preferably from a respected source. You can not provide your own personal opinion on the rankings of the NITs. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]