User talk:Sxrimly

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. --VViking_TalkEdits 13:46, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 13:48, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Linwood High School. Samf4u (talk) 14:05, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Glen (talk) 14:07, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sxrimly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was 16 when I was blocked for messing with my high school wiki page. I'm now in my final year of university and have donated to Wikipedia twice now. I think this should indicate I've matured and appreciate the site a bit more now

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was 16 when I was blocked for messing with my high school wiki page. I'm now in my final year of university and have donated to Wikipedia twice now. I think this should indicate I've matured and appreciate the site a bit more now |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was 16 when I was blocked for messing with my high school wiki page. I'm now in my final year of university and have donated to Wikipedia twice now. I think this should indicate I've matured and appreciate the site a bit more now |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was 16 when I was blocked for messing with my high school wiki page. I'm now in my final year of university and have donated to Wikipedia twice now. I think this should indicate I've matured and appreciate the site a bit more now |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

I'm inclined to give you another chance, but can you give a general idea of what edits you want to make? 331dot (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]