User talk:Sudarshan Dutta

Sankardev

@Sudarshan Dutta, please make elaborate citations for you claims on Sankardev. ComparingQuantities (talk) 15:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mahapurush Sankardev belongs from Kalita (Baro-Bhuyan) family .The Baro-Bhuyans are divided in two groups the Adi-Bhuyans those who are rulers of old Kamrupa Kingdom and many of them are Kayastha/Kshatiryas according to Historians and the second group is Western Kannaujia Bhuyans those who are also believed to be North Indian Kayasthas/Kshatiryas by caste those Adi-Bhuyan or western Bhuyan combination is known as Baro-Bhuyans in Assamese society , those Baro-Bhuyans later on took Kalita caste as their caste identity in Assamese society ,and now every descendants of Assamese Baro-Bhuyans are known as a Kalita caste in Assam .Now every descendant of Assamese Baro-Bhuyan family claim their status as Kalita caste .

Kalita is a caste which derived from ancient Kayastha or Kshatiryas family. For further proof you can see Assamese Hemkosh Dictionary. According to scholars of Assam Kalitas are origin North Indian Kayastha or Kshatirya Sudarshan Dutta (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make any claims without any reliable source to support it, take some time to understand how wikipedia works. ComparingQuantities (talk) 14:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not about reliable source it is all about common Mahapurush Sankardev belongs from our community and we Kalitas ( Baro-Bhuyans) are erstwhile old Kamrupa Kayastha/ Kshatirya family Sudarshan Dutta (talk) 14:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Saikia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Hazarika, you may be blocked from editing. DreamRimmer (talk) 14:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sankardev. DreamRimmer (talk) 14:34, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Sankardev) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kalita (caste). - Arjayay (talk) 09:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Brittial Bania, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 16:09, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]