User talk:Stratovariusfan668

This account is a sockpuppet of Stratovariusfan665 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aiden, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 23:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Swallow the Sun. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Indon (reply) — 23:34, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hawthorne Heights, you will be blocked from editing. — Indon (reply) — 23:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stratovariusfan668 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sigh, blocked AGAIN? All I was doing was inserting the ****ing truth!!!! You know, you guys HAVE to STOP doing this. I DEMAND to be unblocked. Your policies are causing Wikipedia to lose millions of editors. So unblock me, and it will all be fine.

Decline reason:

Uh no. Why would a sock deserve an unblock? You are not inserting the truth; rather, you are just deliberately vandalizing for the sake of attention. NO.— Jmlk 1 7 23:45, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.