User talk:Stephen.akachain.io

This is Stephen.akachain.io's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utop (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qcne were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Utop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 07:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stephen.akachain.io! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 07:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utop (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, lacks any independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Utop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utop (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Thanks for adding two sources, but app store listings aren't enough. Please see Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for more information on the sort of significant, secondary coverage that's needed to show notability of a company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Utop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 09:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utop (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is not the independent coverage in secondary sources that we need.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Utop and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 10:13, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Utop (April 17)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No indication of notability.

Qcne (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello Stephen.akachain.io. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Stephen.akachain.io. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Stephen.akachain.io|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 23:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot,

Thank you so much for reply my message. I'm not receive any money to write this article. I think I have choose wrong category is "paid to edit" because I think if I paid money for Wikipedia I can allow to write about my company "introduce".

I have business license hard copy been approve by Vietnam gorvement.

Could my account allow to write introduce about my company Utop.

Regards,

Hung Nguyen Stephen.akachain.io (talk) 07:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you say that you "paid money for Wikipedia", do you mean that you made a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation?

If you are editing about your business, that is considered "paid editing" because you operate your business to earn a living. Checking the box in the Article Wizard is not a disclosure, no one knows you do that other than you- it's just a way of guiding you. You will need to make the disclosure as my post above instructs. You should also read about conflict of interest.

Wikipedia is not interested in merely documenting the existence of your business, nor is it a place for businesses to tell the world about themselves and what they do. A Wikipedia article about a business must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the business, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. Acceptable sources do not include press releases, staff interviews, brief mentions, announcements of routine business activities, or other primary sources(like government documents). The vast majority of businesses on this planet do not merit articles. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 331dot,

I will be back to build more trusted reference source before re submit again (I think may be a month to build it).

Could you please help unblock the article to allow me resubmit again when it's ready. Stephen.akachain.io (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to edit the draft if you truly feel that you can address the concerns of the reviewers. You will need to set aside everything you know about your business, and only summarize what independent reliable sources- others wholly unaffiliated with your company- choose on their own to say about it. This is exceedingly difficult to do- in my many years here, I could count on one hand the number of people I have seen succeed at doing what you are attempting. My advice is that you forget that Wikipedia exists and go on about the activities of your business- if your business truly merits a Wikipedia article, independent editors will take note of coverage in independent reliable sources and choose to write about your business. I also suggest that you read WP:PROUD(which is about people, but the same principle applies to businesses). If you are able to do as I describe, you can then ask to be able to resubmit the draft at that time.

I am concerned about your statement that you paid money to edit Wikipedia. Did you make a donation to the Foundation, or did you give money to someone else? I just don't want you to have been scammed. 331dot (talk) 11:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks 331dot,

I will follow your advice to arrange everything again to match wikipedia rules and send you again notice once it's ready for review.

Im still not make a donation to wikipedia also not send the fees to anyone.

If the donation happen it is come from my voluntarily without any business factor.

Regards, Stephen.akachain.io (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to make a donation, you are free to do so- but whether you donate to the Foundation or not has no impact on the consideration of your edits. We editors have nothing to do with donations or the donation process. You don't have to donate any money to edit Wikipedia, as a donation is just that- a donation, something voluntary. 331dot (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Stephen.akachain.io usually a rejection is the end for a draft, but please leave a message on my User Talk Page when you believe you have proven Utop meets our WP:NORG criteria and I will review a second time. Qcne (talk) 11:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]