User talk:Stef Stargazer

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anthony Coburn, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. anemoneprojectors talk 16:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Anthony Coburn, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. anemoneprojectors talk 16:13, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Anthony Coburn. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. In addition, writing things like "Tony's full name and dates being verifiable historical facts to anyone who can be bothered to check" is not very helpful to the encyclopaedia. You've been warned about conflict of interest, so I suggest you stop editing this article. Thank you. anemoneprojectors talk 21:41, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. anemoneprojectors talk 13:16, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, was just wondering if by any chance you were really the son of Anthony Coburn? --Victory93 (talk) 02:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia as a soapbox to air real life grievances and disputes. While I understand that you believe our articles regarding your chosen topics are incorrect, Wikipedia absolutely cannot be used to make unsubstantiated legal allegations or to make negative allegations against specific individuals. I would suggest that you contact our volunteers privately via the email address info-en-q@wikimedia.org if you continue to have concerns regarding the accuracy of the articles in question. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:24, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]