User talk:Spongebobsquarepants246

May 2022

Hello, I'm Interstatefive. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Marshall Ganz, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. interstatefive (talk) - just another roadgeek 22:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I have added a proper citation now. Spongebobsquarepants246 (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this a final warning, if you edit logged out again to disrupt the deletion process, I will file an WP:SPI and request an indefinite block. PRAXIDICAE💕 14:59, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leading Change Network

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Leading Change Network, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I understand why it's considered advertising? It merely states the facts. I would like to adjust it based on your comments than have it deleted. Thank you.. Spongebobsquarepants246 (talk) 16:57, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leading Change Network for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading Change Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Change Network until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul McDonald (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leading Change Network for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading Change Network is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Change Network (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PRAXIDICAE💕 17:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:26, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spongebobsquarepants246 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only removed the deletion tag as the discussion stopped and I thought it was concluded. I apologize if this was not the case. My previous contributions were all respectful of the guidelines and tried to add value to the discussion in a respectful manner.

Decline reason:

You're a sock puppet of User:Salem Imam. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spongebobsquarepants246 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of any other account and I do not believe I should be blocked based on a misunderstanding. I only removed the deletion tag as the discussion stopped and I thought it was concluded. I apologize if this was not the case. My previous contributions were all respectful of the guidelines and tried to add value to the discussion in a respectful manner. Spongebobsquarepants246 (talk) 15:29, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You actually created another account and then made this request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.