User talk:Speednat/Archive/2014/May
talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aargau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waldshut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 April 2014
[edit]- News and notes: WMF's draft annual plan turns indigestible as an FDC proposal
- Traffic report: Going to the Doggs
- Breaking: The Foundation's new executive director
- WikiProject report: Genetics
- Interview: Wikipedia in the Peabody Essex Museum
- Featured content: Browsing behaviours
- Recent research: Wikipedia predicts flu more accurately than Google
The Signpost: 07 May 2014
[edit]- Traffic report: TMZedia
- WikiCup: 2014 WikiCup enters round three
- In the media: Google and the flu; Adrianne
- WikiProject report: Singing with Eurovision
- Featured content: Wikipedia at the Rijksmuseum
The Signpost: 14 May 2014
[edit]- Investigative report: Hong Kong's Wikimania 2013—failure to produce financial statement raises questions of probity
- WikiProject report: Relaxing in Puerto Rico
- Featured content: On the rocks
- Traffic report: Eurovision, Google Doodles, Mothers, and 5 May
- Technology report: Technology report needs editor, Media Viewer offers a new look
The Signpost: 21 May 2014
[edit]- News and notes: "Crisis" over Wikimedia Germany's palace revolution
- Featured content: Staggering number of featured articles
- Traffic report: Doodles' dawn
Aaron
[edit]Thank you guy for your comments and explanation. It is appreciated, that you have explained what you have done, and I do understand even if I don't quite agree. However guy please keep in mind a few points below. First, the religion I am associated with does not use YHWH in the main text of their writings. Second, I have chosen to do that, since that is generally the scholarly way of doing it. Third, wheter it is trivial or not is not up to any one person to decide. Fourth, a title such as "LORD", should in no way replace a proper name.( Adonai/Lord is different than YHWH/Yahweh/Jehovah) So guy, while it is true that many other articles might not be up to Par scholarly, hopefully in time they might be. So guy, I conclude by saying- I could have said- "Speednat" instead of "guy", but isn't it trivial? Hope you get a chuckle out of that :-) I do not plan on changing it, because I understand that is just how language works at times, wheter correct (or in this case clearly incorrect). I was just trying to improve the accuracy of the article. One way to do that would be to keep LORD and put (YHWH) in parentheses where the Hebrew has the Tetragram. Would that be acceptable? You would do well to read this page (or article): http://www.ubs-translations.org/tbt/1988/04/TBT198804.html?seq=14 Johanneum (talk) 20:52, 24 May 2014 (UTC)