User talk:Solkarn

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Paulmlieberman (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Solkarn. You've been warned per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. You may be blocked the next time you revert at Wakhan Corridor unless you have obtained a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. You appear to be inserting wrong information to the article, since the sources say the corridor is part of Afghanistan. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wakhan Corridor is covered by discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EdJohnston (talk) 17:10, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Broghil Pass, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:18, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gujrat District‎

Hello. Your recent edit to Gujrat District‎ appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]